David Martindale is certain Rangers' opener against Livingston should have been ruled out.
The Lions manager insists Abdallah Sima was guilty of a "clear" push on his defender Jamie Brandon in the lead up to the goal at Ibrox.
However, Willie Collum waved play on and VAR Nick Walsh backed the decision with no on-field review of the initial decision.
"I think the first goal is a foul, I've watched it back myself there's clear hands-on and it's a push - not a huge push - but when you're running with momentum and a wee bit off balance and get a push you are going to fall," said Martindale in an interview on BBC Sportsound.
"For the life of me I don't know how we haven't got a foul...the first goal really, really hurts us, it spooks us. I'm disappointed because as it went to VAR review because it was in the phase of play that led to the goal my understanding was it doesn't have to be clear and obvious if it leads to taking the ball and putting it in the back of your net. I thought it would get overturned, and it never got overturned."
READ MORE: Beale confirms Roofe Rangers injury 'problem' and offers Ridvan update
And Martindale admitted he couldn't help but feel the decision might not have been the same had it been his side that had scored as he cited the Ibrox impact.
Asked whether he'd contact the Scottish FA over the decision, he said: "I don't think anyone goes out to make bad decisions, we've got the technology but it comes down to the opinions of people making the decisions. Sometimes the decisions fall your way, sometimes they don't.
"Ibrox away, quarter-final, pfft...I've not seen many of them given if I'm honest. I stand here probably looking at it from a negative point of view thinking if that was our goal I'm not so sure...that's how it feels coming to the big venues.
"I don't think any officials go out to get it wrong, it's their opinion of it but I can't believe it's not a foul. I'll not be contacting anyone and complaining to be honest. It is what it is."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel