Steve Clarke has lifted the lid on Elliot Anderson's decision to pick Scotland over England.
The 20-year-old Newcastle midfielder was named in the upcoming national team squad for the double-header against Cyprus and England next month.
It was his first call-up, with the international allegiances not yet known until this morning.
The player was born in England and he had represented them at youth level, as well Scotland.
However, after a "little think", Anderson has elected to commit his international future to Scotland. He qualifies for Scotland selection through the grandparent rule.
And Clarke has revealed that it's one that has taken a while, but an outcome he is pleased with.
Clarke said: “Obviously he’s a good player and he’s doing well for his club. Elliot’s one who has been through the underage groups with Scotland and one we’ve had an eye on. He had an enquiry, a little think about choosing between Scotland and England.
“We had some good discussions with the boy and his family and he’s chosen to come with us which I think is good for us now - and certainly good for us in the future. He’s been with us in general.
"Obviously when you get to a certain stage in your career and you can say your career has started to take off, which Elliot’s has at Newcastle. We’ve got some great reports from people within the club at Newcastle which is great to hear.
READ MORE: Steve Clarke names Scotland squad for Cyprus and England clashes
“And then you have to make that choice. Elliot was born in England, he’s got decisions to make and we’re just happy he’s come down on our side.
"I’ve always tried to look down towards the underage groups - the Under-21s - to try and give a pathway so we’re not just having a squad for now but looking to build a squad that will carry us through not just the next tournament but the one after that and the one after that and Elliot is part of that process.
“We’ve had a great start to the current qualifying campaign and we’ll look to continue that against Cyprus but if you can blood players in good moments then it’s probably easier than in difficult moments.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here