MOTHERWELL supporters were given a quick reminder on Saturday of just what they would have been missing out on had defender Dan Casey not made the decision to return to the club.
The big centre-back came crashing back into Scottish football against Queen’s Park, with his first involvement in the game to crash through the back of visiting attacker Patrick Jarrett.
It was typical of his robust approach to defending, with the Irishman playing a major part in the resolve that the Steelmen discovered as Stuart Kettlewell revitalised their season last term.
His short-term contract expired at the end of the campaign, and the longer the summer went on, the more it seemed that he may not be returning to Lanarkshire despite the success he enjoyed in his brief spell at Fir Park.
READ MORE: Jon Obika strikes it lucky as Motherwell see off Queen's Park
That speculation over his future was finally brought to an end when he penned a two-year contract earlier this month, and he has explained that his decision was driven by the environment at Fir Park bringing out the best in him, and the promise of what lies ahead for Kettlewell’s team.
"It's good to be back, I'm happy I'm here and looking to kick on,” Casey said.
"I had a few options, but six months is a short stint here and I wanted to give it a right go and see what we can do as a team.
"I had options, but this is the one I wanted the most. It took longer than I wanted but I kept busy over the summer and got 90 minutes in against Queen's Park which I'm happy with.
"We are going to have to work hard, we obviously lost a few key players from last year but we've got quality coming in and get things going together as a team.
"I liked the team culture the manager and staff and obviously the players. That was one of the big things. The fans were brilliant too.
"The pitch is brilliant, there's a lot of positives. It's a good club to be at.
"I've been all around the place but I wanted to give this a try. It's very close to home just being from Ireland. I enjoyed my time here.
"The whole team was brilliant last year, but that was last season. We need to look forward and push on.
"It's a fresh start, we've obviously got cup game next week and then it's Dundee in the league so we obviously want to be ready for that."
READ MORE: Stuart Kettlewell hoping for Motherwell clarity on summer transfers
Motherwell’s win over Queen’s Park on Saturday courtesy of Jon Obika’s deflected first-half strike came off the back of a less than vintage performance, but the three points leaves them in pole position to qualify from League Cup Group G, sitting three points clear of East Fife at the top of the table.
It is an altogether different story for the visitors, who now have gleaned just one point from their opening two matches despite plenty of plaudits for their style of play under new manager Robin Veldman.
The Dutchman though has plenty of disciples of his total football doctrine within the Queen’s squad, with striker Ruari Paton among those raving about his coaching methods.
They didn’t quite have the cutting edge to go with their pretty passing on Saturday, but Paton is sure that will come in time.
"It was frustrating,” Paton said.
“I thought we had some nice stuff but we didn't have the clear cut chances for myself from a selfish point of view and the team. Saying that, we did have a few chances and could've scored.
"You can be too nice, but you can be too brash as well. It's finding that fine line, the nice stuff has to be effective and you need that ruthless edge of scoring goals because that's what wins you games. Hopefully we can bring the football side and the goals as well.
"The manager's wealth of football knowledge is scary. It's very, very different. It's the opposite of the standard way of British coaching. It's about learning, some of the stuff he says to me, I'm going to have to get used to this.
“People say 'trust the manager' but I actually do. You can see the good stuff, it's definitely nicer to watch than some grounds when they are just kicking the ball away from each other.
“The goals will come, I'm not worried about that.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here