This article was first published today in our bespoke Sports newsletter The Fixture. You can sign up in seconds to receive it straight to your inbox every weekday here.
There have been eyebrows raised in recent days over the potential transfer of Jota to Saudi Pro League side Al-Ittihad but there should be no great surprise at the choice of his destination.
The smart money had been on the Celtic winger heading to the English Premier League with Tottenham Hotspur – Ange Postecoglou's new club – said to be the most obvious suitors for a player who had been a key part in the Australian's Treble winning feats at Parkhead. But, speak to some seasoned observers who covered Celtic last season, and they will tell you that there was a sense that Postecoglou had started to feel that the Portuguese attacker had become a little too big for his boots.
In attempting to make sense of his impending transfer to Saudi, of why a 24-year-old who is just about to enter his prime years would forgo a move up the European ladder, there have been some attempts at justification for the decision. The £10m salary is one factor, the opportunity to play in a league where Cristiano Ronaldo will still attract the attention of the Portugal manager, Roberto Martinez, is another – as fatuous as it sounds. There is also the knowledge that he is still young and can return after a couple of seasons as a very rich man with plenty of years left to make an impact on the European stage.
But none of those explanations are the main reason for the choice of Saudi Arabia, however. Indeed, the key explanation revolves around player representation and one of the biggest, most influential names in the world. It is this man's presence which helps to explain why – at face value – Jota is moving to Saudi Arabia even if there appears to be little sense from a career development perspective. It requires a degree of knowledge about the workings of how transfers and players' futures are often controlled by that of their agents.
Specifically, we are talking about Gestifute, the agency owned by the super agent Jorge Mendes. It is possible to reel off multiple transfers over the past couple of decades that caused a stir when they were announced. Not long after they had won the Champions League in 2004, Portugal international midfielders Costinha and Maniche along with the Brazilian striker Derlei joined Dynamo Moscow from Porto. The common denominator? Dynamo were suddenly cash rich after an infusion of funds from Alexey Fedorychev, Russia's 100th richest man, and, of course, the trio also happened to be represented by Mendes and Gestifute. In more recent times, Ruben Neves, Matheus Nunes and a slew of other exciting, uber-talented Portuguese players have ended up at Wolverhampton Wanderers when expected to move elsewhere. 'Why Wolves?' the people exclaimed. Why, indeed? There was a simple answer, though, and it was Jorge Mendes and Gestifute.
When the Chinese government suddenly started chucking money at football in much the same way that the Saudis are doing now, there was a rush of Europe's top stars to move there. And why was that? Well, you can probably see where this is going, can't you? Hulk, another former Porto star, who took a detour to then Russian super club Zenit St Petersburg (where he joined former Porto centre half Bruno Alves and another Gestifute client Danny Alves, who, coincidentally had also been at Dynamo Moscow with Costinha et al) before ending up in China, for example, is a Gestifute client.
And so to Saudi Arabia itself. Let's look at the list of players who have now moved or are now being linked with transfers to super rich clubs offering life-changing sums of money. Oh, look, there's Ruben Neves, who will be a team-mate of Jota's at Al-Ittihad after leaving Wolves, the de facto UK arm of Gestifute. And there's Gestifute poster boy Cristiano Ronaldo at Al Nassr. Oh, and another of Mendes' favourite sons, Bernardo Silva, he's wanted in the Pro League, too. So, remind me, who is it that Jota is represented by again?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel