MARK HATELEY insists the departure of Ange Postecoglou hasn't altered the challenge facing Rangers boss Michael Beale next term.
The 42-year-old will go head-to-head with a new adversary in the heat of Old Firm battle after Postecoglou quit Parkhead to take over at Tottenham Hotspur this week.
Celtic remain in the market for the Australian's successor in the dugout and the likes of Jesse Marsch and Enzo Maresca have been touted for the position as Brendan Rodgers has been linked with a shock return to Glasgow.
READ MORE: What does Postecoglou Celtic exit mean for Rangers and Michael Beale?
It has been a far more straightforward summer so far at Ibrox as Beale has released a handful of key players and added Kieran Dowell, Dujon Sterling and Jack Butland to his squad ahead of his first proper crack at the Premiership title.
And nine-in-a-row hero Hateley - who insisted it is not a 'one summer fix' for Rangers in the coming weeks - believes the events across the city haven't shifted the dynamic in the fight for Old Firm supremacy.
"Not really," Hateley said when asked if the landscape had changed for Beale in the wake of Postecglou's exit from Celtic. "He’ll still have the same challenge.
"Depending on the structure that’s in place for the agreement that Ange will have with Celtic and Tottenham about taking players. Until we find that out, we just don’t know.
"The way Celtic have played consistently over the period has been very very good. That doesn’t change if the players stay the same.
"You are still going to retain one of the guys who’s been in the backroom staff. Whoever is going to come in will have the same philosophy.
READ MORE: Adam Devine reveals Michael Beale's Rangers advice ahead of Ibrox bid
"I would imagine that’s the way the Celtic board will probably go – with the same sort of principles the team has to have.
"I see the boy who was at Leeds (Marsch) has been touted. They were all out attack, 100 per cent effort, that sort of philosophy.
"I’d imagine the next manager will be the same. If he does have then it just continues.
"But it depends on whether the players stay or are attracted down to the Premier League."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here