This article was first published today in our bespoke Sports newsletter The Fixture. You can sign up in seconds to receive it straight to your inbox every weekday here.
David Moyes has often given off the vibe of the old school football manager struggling to come to terms with the modern world. When he was sacked by Real Sociedad in 2015, his difficulties in learning the language – he once infamously gave a car crash interview in which he mangled the pronunciation of Real Madrid midfielder Asier Illarramendi's name – and assimilating with the local population were given as significant reasons as to why he failed in San Sebastian. Two years later, as Sunderland manager, he found himself facing a disrepute charge in front of the Football Association for comments he made to BBC sports reporter Vicky Sparks during a press conference in which he said: "You were just getting a wee bit naughty at the end there, so just watch yourself. You still might get a slap even though you're a woman. Careful the next time you come in."
It's reductive to pick two examples from a man's past and present them as compelling evidence of his character. Indeed, it says everything about Moyes as a man that he immediately recognised his mistake and apologised to Ms Sparks. Moyes, like plenty of football men of his vintage, is not easily pigeon-holed.
At Everton, he would arrive before sunrise, laying out his training drills for the morning sessions ahead. He was an early adopter of sports science. He is a humble, engaging character who delivered fruit and veg to the elderly during lockdown. He is one also shaped by Glasgow and unsurprisingly by football, having been raised in a household where his father David Sr was the manager of Drumchapel Amateurs.
The game has brought him to his lowest ebb – the brickbats have landed wounds at the various clubs where he has failed. Having enjoyed a continuous upward trajectory at Preston North End and then later Everton, his woes at Manchester United ended in humiliation when he was sacked after just 10 months. Yet, there were no recriminations from Moyes, just regrets. "I look back with unbelievable fondness, but great disappointment I didn't do well enough to get longer than 10 months . . . overall it was a great experience, just one, unfortunately, for me was a bit too short,” he said a few years ago.
There have been highs since, however. His work at West Ham during two seasons in which he guided the club to sixth (2020-21) and seventh (2021-22) place finishes are made all the more remarkable by the fact that he was doing so as a returning outcast, a manager who had seen the vitriol from the club's supporters during a previous spell at the club from 2017-18 in which he steered the Londoners clear of relegation. This season has been less productive in league and particularly disappointing following a summer transfer splurge that suggested they would trouble the top four rather than the bottom four they occupied for much of the campaign. Moyes admitted that calls for him to go in March stung him and yet he might still oversee West Ham's best season since they won the FA Cup in 1980. He could still have the last laugh.
Later this evening in Prague, he may just do the unthinkable by winning a trophy for West Ham – a club whose trophy drought extends longer than even that of Tottenham Hotspur. Should they prevail against Fiorentina in the Conference League final (kick-off 8pm), it will end a 43-year wait for silverware and will position Moyes among club legends such as Ron Greenwood and John Lyall, the only other West Ham managers to secure a trophy for the club. The fate that awaits him, however, is one of uncertainty. A hardened traveller in modern football's unforgiving surroundings, the 60-year-old Moyes knows exactly what will happen should his side lose tonight's final and even if West Ham win, there may be no guarantees. Yet while others might feel the need to trumpet their own contribution, Moyes has been firm in his claims that winning tonight is all about how the club can further its aims of becoming sustained challengers. He deserves far better.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here