Ange Postecoglou has urged fans to focus on the football after referee Kevin Clancy received death threats in the aftermath of Celtic’s 3-2 win over Rangers last weekend.
The official, who disallowed an Alfredo Morelos goal early on at Parkhead, was targeted in the wake of the powderkeg derby in Glasgow, prompting Police Scotland to investigate.
Some supporters claim the decision to chop off the visitors’ opener – a call that has since been disputed by Rangers – ultimately swung the match in their rivals’ favour but Postecoglou feels such a view is reductive.
The Greek-Australian believes it was an error-strewn contest and does not see the value in chalking it all up to a single incident, and he is hoping his players will have ironed out the creases by the time they travel to Kilmarnock on Sunday.
READ MORE: VAR controversies can’t disguise that Celtic operate at a higher level to Rangers
“If you look at last week it was a game that had everything,” Postecoglou said. “It was exciting, we won, so we were happy. I get that. But nobody can tell me that was a high-quality football match.
“There were mistakes from both teams. Both teams made a hell of a lot of mistakes. We certainly analysed ours on the Monday. And I would say both managers would agree they probably made mistakes on the day.
“The fact people think one individual — in this case the official — and one decision has decided the outcome of the game is just not right. It’s not right. I felt we should have had a penalty at Ibrox. That’s my opinion. But it doesn’t really matter at the end of the day. These are all opinions.
“We don’t have to make the decisions. When an official has to make a decision we have to respect the fact that’s what they have done.
“When you’re analysing a game — and I get it, particularly here in Glasgow where if you take one side or another you’re painted as being in one camp or the other — but I think there are enough independent observers who could walk out of that game and say: ‘it was a game full of mistakes and ultimately not one decided the game’.
“My role on a Monday is to analyse our performance and our players were outstanding in their character and will they showed to get the job done in a difficult game with a lot riding on it. But we made a lot of mistakes during that game and that’s the feedback we gave the players. If we want to improve, that’s where the improvement will come from.”
Postecoglou added: “My reaction [to Clancy receiving death threats] is pretty much like everyone else’s. It should not come to that and hopefully the authorities are dealing with whomever has been found going down that route.
“We understand we are all working in a public space and with that comes scrutiny but it should always be on a professional level. It should never interfere with players’, managers’ or officials’ private lives.
READ MORE: Police probing threatening messages sent to ref Kevin Clancy after Old Firm game
“That’s totally out of bounds and it should be dealt with strongly —but especially with officials because players and managers, we have clubs and supporter bases that can get behind us. But officials rely on the integrity and respect of everyone else involved in the game to protect them from things like this.
“It’s a timely reminder to everyone — myself included — that the language we use and how we address these things is really important. I’m disappointed it’s come to this and hopefully the authorities deal with it.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel