James Tavernier says that Rangers’ performance against Celtic at the weekend has made him confident the Ibrox side can knock their city rivals out of the Scottish Cup, despite their 3-2 defeat at Celtic Park.
The Rangers captain scored twice on Saturday to bring up his century of goals for the club, but his contribution ultimately wasn’t enough for Michael Beale’s men to salvage anything from their trip across Glasgow.
Tavernier says he saw enough in his team’s showing though to give him heart that Rangers can gain a measure of revenge by storming into the Scottish Cup Final at Hampden.
READ MORE: Tavernier questions why Clancy not called to check Morelos incident
“It’s disappointing to come away with nothing,” Tavernier said.
“We wanted to come away with three points.
“We’ve obviously got an important game against them in three weeks' time, so if we take the positives out of this game and apply ourselves in the same way – with a bit more – then I’m really confident in the team.
“Our next game, the St Mirren game, is important because we need a run of consistency going into the semi-final.
“It’s obviously a massive game in three weeks. But St Mirren is massive because we need to get back to winning ways and work on ourselves.
“But, yeah, three weeks’ time is obviously massive, and we’ve got to make sure we get in the final.”
Tavernier was pleased with the way that Rangers played at Celtic Park on the whole, saying that manager Beale got his tactics spot on, and he pinned the defeat on a combination of contentious refereeing calls and a lack of a clinical edge.
“I thought that the shape we had worked really well,” he said.
“After 15 minutes, we started getting the ball and moving it really well. We were frustrating them and creating our own chances.
“I felt we could have created more chances, but to go in at half-time 1-1 we felt we could go out there and do the same.
“We did when we started the second half really well. I didn’t feel Alfredo’s goal was a foul and then I felt the referee should maybe have been given an opportunity to look at it to see if it was a foul.
READ MORE: The defining Celtic vs Rangers moments captured by world-famous agency
“Seeing their second goal coming off Jota’s arm and for that not to be looked at is obviously hard. But we as a team have got to look past those decisions and try and get it over the line ourselves.
“We’re just disappointed that we didn’t do it.”
Tavernier has also defended centre-backs Ben Davies and John Souttar, both of whom were culpable for errors that led to Celtic’s second and third goals, scored by Kyogo Furuhashi and Jota respectively.
Souttar had a moment to forget as he sold goalkeeper Allan McGregor short with a poor backpass for Jota to score that critical third goal, but Tavernier felt that Souttar performed well considering the injury-hit defender was making his first start since August in place of the sidelined Connor Goldson.
“I thought for Soutts to come in at the last minute, he had a really good game,” he said.
“But it’s just obviously small margins. I felt obviously the two goals that we conceded in the second half were…it’s obviously a hard one to take.
“It happens, but it’s a hard one to take. But predominantly throughout the game, they coped with it really well.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel