David Martindale admits Livingston were ‘spooked’ by conceding a penalty seconds into a heavy defeat at St Mirren.
Livi failed to recover from going behind in the opening moments after Luiyi de Lucas was penalised for handball. That set the tone for a nightmare first-half and a result which dents their Premiership top six ambitions.
Martindale, however, does believe they were wrongly denied a lifeline by an Andrew Shinnie effort that was adjudged not to have crossed the line.
“There’s not been many teams gave a penalty away in the first eight seconds of a game,” the manager said. “To say it was a bad start and got worse is probably a good analogy.
READ MORE: Stephen Robinson urges St Mirren to get what they 'deserve' in race for top six
“We know what they’re going to do. We got a bit spooked from it and St Mirren got a lot of energy from it.
“We’d a legitimate goal from Shinnie in the first-half which St Mirren players say was in so I’m disappointed about that. It would’ve given us something to come out for.
“I’m hugely disappointed about the manner of the goals we lost, but in the modern day they’re probably both penalties. I don’t know how you jump without using your arms. I’ve come to accept it, I just hope we start getting them and I think we had a decent claim with Stephen Kelly.
“But the goals were two penalties and a shot because of our defending. They were cheap goals and we didn’t give ourselves any opportunities. We let ourselves down defending our area in the first-half and we won’t get anywhere playing the way we did in the first-half.
READ MORE: St Mirren 3 Livingston 0 - Instant reaction to the burning issues
“But we’re still in it and there’s a lot to play for. It’ll go to the wire. We’ve had one foot in the top six and never taken the opportunity to cement it. We’re still in the fight.
“Every one will get to sleep at 3am, wake up at 7am and that four hours will be a broken sleep because you’re thinking about the game.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here