Callum Davidson was proud of his team’s response to going a man down in their 1-0 loss at home to Aberdeen as he praised his players’ performance, even if they finished the game with nothing to show for their efforts.
The hosts were reduced to 10 men within minutes of kick-off when Andrew Considine was sent for denying a clear goal-scoring opportunity and although the Dons dominated possession, Saints defended doggedly before exerting some pressure of their own late on.
Graeme Shinnie’s red card for the visitors led to a frenetic finish in Perth and although the home players suffered a defeat, Davidson was able to draw positives from the team’s display.
The referee was called over to the pitchside monitor after initially awarding a penalty kick for Considine’s challenge but after having a second look, a free-kick was given instead as the defender went for an early bath.
“It’s a difficult one, we would rather have given the penalty away and Andy stayed on the pitch because we ended up playing 92 minutes with 10 men,” Davidson rued.
“I’ve not seen it yet. He was quick to give the penalty when it was outside the box so that was the wrong decision. And I thought some of the bookings… well, I’m not going to start.
READ MORE: St Johnstone 0 Aberdeen 1: Considine birthday card leaves Saints short in Perth
“I’d rather just talk about the reaction we got from the players because we were not happy with the way we started at Kilmarnock in the last game.
“It was a tough afternoon for the players but I thought they were brilliant. They kept their shape, their discipline and they created chances. It’s disappointing we didn’t get anything from the game because they put so much into it.
“When you go to 10 men you can’t just go gung-ho straight away, you have to stay in the game and pick your moments.
“I felt the subs were good when they came on, they impacted the game and we had a few chances.
“As the game wore on Aberdeen got nervous, we limited them in the second half and created chances - it’s just a pity we didn’t take one of them.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here