MICHAEL BEALE insists Jon McLaughlin shouldn't be condemned for his Old Firm howler as he paved the way for the keeper to grab the Rangers gloves this term.
McLaughlin started the campaign as Giovanni van Bronckhorst's first choice between the sticks but paid the price for successive 4-0 defeats to Celtic and Ajax in September.
A change of custodian saw Allan McGregor return but McLaughlin featured against Dundee in the cup and deputised in Dingwall as Rangers earned a Premiership victory.
Beale opted to put McLaughlin back in for the win away to Dundee United on Sunday and a clean sheet helped secure three points as Fashion Sakala and Malik Tillman netted.
Rangers won't make moves to strengthen the goalkeeper department during the January window and it could now be horses for courses for the remainder of the campaign.
Beale said: "Jon has come off and he’s kept another clean sheet and I am delighted for him personally as well.
“I thought it might be a game with a lot of set plays and that didn’t really pan out. Jon excels in that.
"I knew I was changing one or two other things in the team as well so he gives us that extra little bit of height in terms of coming to claim it.
READ MORE: Five key issues as Rangers step it up to beat Dundee United
“Also I feel this year the narrative around Jon is a poor narrative. In my time at the club previously and since I’ve been back Jon’s record per game with wins and clean sheets is absolutely outstanding.
"He made quite a high profile mistake but I don’t think we should condemn him. It’s important that I keep Jon focused and feeling like he is wanted and loved around here because he is.
“If I think it’s right [I will use them both]. It’s nothing against Allan.
"Allan obviously came out a few weeks ago at Ross County for Jon to go in. I just had a hunch that this week or looking at tis month I wanted Jon to play this game.
"We’ve played it and we’ve won and hopefully now some of the fuss can go away. We win with Allan and we win with Jon that’s a good sign.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel