MICHAEL BEALE insists he wasn't being disrespectful when he labelled Celtic as 'the other team' in the Premiership title race.
Beale was asked about the chances of Rangers challenging for the silverware this term ahead of his first match in charge against Hibernian last week.
He has come in for bizarre criticism in some quarters for opting not to name Celtic in his answer to a question at his press conference on Wednesday.
And the Ibrox boss, speaking ahead of the trip to Aberdeen, has now clarified his position following accusations that he showed a lack of respect across the Old Firm divide.
Beale said: “Listen, the other day I used a term - ‘other team’ - but I’m new back into the country and I didn’t get where I am being disrespectful.
“I was asked a question, ‘You’re nine points behind…’ and my answer was, ‘Well the other team have to lose some’.
“That wasn’t in any way me being disrespectful. I want to cut that short where that is.
“I’ve got no issue naming the other team’s names. Celtic, Aberdeen, Hibs, whoever it is no way am I going to be disrespectful.
“Between now and the end of the season we have to win every game, including the three Old Firms, and pick up our goal difference to get in front. So we know it’s a tough ask.
READ MORE: Ryan Jack provides Rangers contract update and details Ibrox focus
“The bigger thing around that is can we get the team looking how I think we should look?
“Are the players looking like they’re happy playing for the shirt and are the fans having the team they watch? Are they excited by the team and pulling in the same direction?
“That’s the job for me and my management team. But that bit the other day, I don’t like that because it’s not what I am.
“That was a very innocent team that’s been taken too far because I’m a coach that respects (others).
“I’ve come back into this league because I enjoy it. I think there’s very good managers in this league.
“I think what Ange Postecoglou has done in his time is very impressive.
“It’s important now we get back on the journey I had previously here with Steven and we become impressive again as well."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel