Capitulation, capitulation, capitulation
What a difference one half of football makes. Before the break, for the most part, Rangers looked comfortable against the Premier League giants. While they never really cut the Reds open, they carried a threat throughout and obviously got their early rewards through Scott Arfield. The second-half was a story of total capitulation for Giovanni van Bronckhorst’s side. The only word that can be used to describe the result for Rangers is embarrassing. Liverpool will thump better teams that Rangers, let’s be clear. However, to completely fall apart like they did was shambolic. There are manners in which to lose a game. This was not one of them. The fans will demand answers – no matter how good Liverpool are.
Too many negative moves
Unlike how we’re used to seeing Rangers perform domestically, van Bronckhorst’s players lacked bravery to play through the lines of Liverpool. Far too often the ball was either passed backwards or sideways, much to the understandable annoyance of the Ibrox faithful. Of course, Liverpool are one of the best pressing teams on the planet. However, it was not a full-strength Liverpool team from the start. Particularly during the first-half Rangers’ defenders had a chance to zip a pass into the midfield to allow the team to play from there. More often than not the ball would end up back to Allan McGregor before a repeat situation or the ball being launched.
Davies showed impressive first-half moments
If the ex-Liverpool squad player can stay fit then van Bronckhorst has a good player on his hands at Ibrox. Steady and confident on the ball, the one-time Preston ace has great ball-playing attributes which will suit Rangers’ usual possession-based game. He showed he has the physicality to mix it up against some top strikers too. Darwin Nunez is no slouch. Fairly pacey as well, Davies put in a solid first-half showing. It’s safe to say he will play a key role for the club going forward.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel