FOUR-TIME Ryder Cup veteran Jordan Spieth believes the United States will head to Rome confident of a first win on foreign soil in 30 years.
The Americans have not been victorious in Europe since Tom Watson captained his side to a 15-13 success at The Belfry in 1993 but are likely to arrive at the Marco Simeone Golf and Country Club next September as favourites.
Having inflicted a record 19-9 defeat on Europe a year ago, a USA team won a ninth successive Presidents Cup against the International team on Sunday with seven players who featured at Whistling Straits.
Even the loss of Dustin Johnson, Brooks Koepka and Bryson DeChambeau from their last Ryder Cup side due to their ties to LIV Golf barely weakened the USA as debutant Max Homa scored four points from the four matches he played.
Davis Love III’s team boasted five of the world’s top-10 and 11 of the top-20 and that is why Spieth thinks they can win in Italy after six straight defeats on European soil.
“It’s a tall task to ask, going over there. I’ve played in a couple of away games now and they’re very different,” said the 29-year-old after winning his first singles match at a team event at the eighth attempt.
“But I’d take this team over there against anybody in the world.
“I think that winning at home is special in its own way, and there’s nothing that beats it, but going over there on the road and winning would be incredibly special next year and I really hope I’m a part of the team.
“I’m very confident in our ability to go over there and win. You could tell me the last time it happened over there but nobody here has any scar tissue.
“Everybody on this panel would very much embrace what that looks like next year.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here