MURRAY DAVIDSON has opened up on his red card frustrations that saw him sent off during St Johnstone's league opener against Hibs.
The McDiarmid Park midfielder was ordered off by referee Euan Anderson following a mistimed challenge on Ryan Porteous.
Anderson then flashed a yellow card just minutes later to Hibs defender Marijan Cabraja, who lunged into a very similar challenge on Saints' Ryan McGowan.
A lack of consistency was the main frustration for Davidson, but he has revealed that whistler Anderson's explanation of his tackle was wrong.
He explained: “At the time I thought it was slightly harsh. After seeing it again I can see why the referee has sent me off.
“There were a few other tackles in the game that I felt, if mine was a red card, then they should be red cards as well.
“The referee explained why he sent me off after the game and nothing could be done.
“I was more disappointed and frustrated because it was the first game of the season and to make things worse, we lost the last-minute goal. You move on and hopefully it doesn’t happen again.
“The referee said to a few people that he thought I went over the ball, which I didn’t. It was mistimed.
“Referees have tough jobs I totally get that. As soon as I saw the tackle back I can see why he sent me off."
He continued: “My only issue was that there was another tackle in the game that was very similar and I feel that he was endangering the opponent more than my tackle.
“If he had sent the both of us off I wouldn’t have had any argument after. If one is a red, they are both reds. If one is a yellow, they are both yellow.
“I certainly didn’t go in over the top of the ball, I didn’t go in to hurt anyone. It was a difficult few days because it is not a nice feeling.
“If VAR is there certainly both tackles that we are talking about are the same punishment.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here