Phil Mickelson is embarrassed by his “reckless” gambling but insists his decision to join the controversial Saudi-backed LIV Golf Invitational Series this week has nothing to do with financial difficulty.
Reports have suggested the six-time major winner lost about 40million US dollars (£32m) between 2010 and 2014.
However, the left-hander insists he and his family remain financially secure and signing up to the breakaway series has more to do with giving him more freedom over his playing schedule than chasing lost money.
“At this point in my life, just as importantly, it gives some balance in my life for Amy (his wife) and I,” he told Sports Illustrated.
“My family and I are and have been financially secure for some time.
“My gambling got to a point of being reckless and embarrassing. I had to address it. And I’ve been addressing it for a number of years. And for hundreds of hours of therapy.
“Gambling has been part of my life ever since I can remember but about a decade ago is when I would say it became reckless.
“It isn’t a threat to me or my financial security. It was just a number of poor decisions.
“It’s embarrassing. I don’t like that people know. The fact is I’ve been dealing with it for some time.
“Amy has been very supportive of it and with me and the process. We’re at place after many years where I feel comfortable with where that is.”
Mickelson has flown to England to join a 48-man field for the first LIV Golf tournament at Centurion Club in Hertfordshire.
He and two-time major winner Dustin Johnson and European Ryder Cup stars such as Sergio Garcia, Lee Westwood, Ian Poulter, Graeme McDowell and Martin Kaymer will play for a £20.2million prize fund and £4m winner’s cheque.
Back in February the 51-year-old American described the Saudis as “scary m************” and said he was well aware of Saudi Arabia’s “horrible record on human rights” – including the murder of Washington Post reporter Jamal Khashoggi – in an interview with the author of a forthcoming biography.
Yet he added that working with the Saudis was a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to reshape how the PGA Tour operates” by creating a new series of tournaments with a different format.
“I certainly do not condone human rights violations. And addressing what happened to Jamal Khashoggi is awful,” Mickelson, who has not played and kept a low profile after those comments, added to Sports Illustrated.
“But I have seen the good that the game of golf has done throughout history and I really believe that LIV can be good for the game of golf as well.”
Unlike fellow competitor Kevin Na, who resigned his PGA Tour membership, Mickelson has retained his life membership status and also plans to play in next week’s US Open, having missed the year’s first two majors.
“I have not resigned my membership. I worked really hard to earn that lifetime membership and I’m hopeful that I’ll have the ability to play wherever I want, where it’s the PGA Tour, LIV or wherever else I want,” he said.
“I’ve had many conversations with the organisations that run the majors. I do want to keep those conversations private but I am looking forward to playing the US Open and I’ll be there. I’m under the understanding that I’m able to play.”
On missing the Masters and defence of his US PGA title, Mickelson added: “I was under the understanding that I was able to play but I really needed some time away.
“I did watch them but I didn’t necessarily want to be there. I wasn’t in a position to be there and be able to compete.”
The Centurion tournament is the first of eight LIV Golf events scheduled for this year with plans to expand to 14 in the coming years.
The competitions are to be played over 54 holes rather than the standard 72 with groups teeing off simultaneously on different holes in a ‘shotgun’ start.
Greg Norman, chief executive and commissioner of LIV Golf, said: “Phil Mickelson is unequivocally one of the greatest golfers of this generation.
“His contributions to the sport and connection to fans around the globe cannot be overstated and we are grateful to have him.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here