STEVE CLARKE admits that a poor first-half performance proved costly in Scotland’s bid to reach the Qatar World Cup in winter as the national team suffered a 3-1 defeat to Ukraine at Hampden.
Trailing 1-0 at the break, Clarke brought on Ryan Christie for Lyndon Dykes to give his side a greater presence in midfield but the team were then hit with a sucker punch as the Ukrainians scored a second within minutes of the restart.
A deflected Callum McGregor strike gave the Tartan Army hope of a comeback before an injury-time strike from Ukraine sealed their progression to the World Cup play-off final against Wales.
“In the first half I don’t think we played enough but they pressed us well,” Clarke told Sky Sports. “They forced us to go a little bit longer, which suited them more than us.
“I made the change at half-time but we didn’t give ourselves the chance to utilise that change because we went 2-0 down very early on.
“The change was made to get the ball on the ground and play through the lines again. We didn’t do that well enough in the first half.
“After that we showed character and we had a go. We left ourselves open at the back, which we had to risk.
“John [McGinn] missed a big chance that would have given us at least half an hour to try and chase the 2-1.
“We got the goal eventually and we chased it well. we tried as hard as we could and they defended with their lives.
“It is Ukraine’s night, not Scotland’s.
“It got a little bit frantic. We didn’t quite have the composure to get it down and create a clear-cut chance but we did have some chances. We didn’t take them on the night.
“The third goal for Ukraine is the consequence of us chasing the game but it puts a better reflection on the scoreline for them.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here