Craig Gordon 9
Stunning performances have become the norm. While he was on the losing side the keeper was superb again at Hampden. Denied Kent twice and a ridiculous stop from Aribo but had no chance with the goals.
Stephen Kingsley 7
Assured in defence but limited in his influence going forward. Composed on the ball and when defending.
John Souttar 8
He’s heading to Rangers in the summer, but was magnificent against them in his final Hearts appearance. A towering performance throwing his body on the line throughout.
Craig Halkett 7
Part of a solid back-three for the majority of the afternoon. Barely put a foot wrong and was commanding in his own penalty box winning everything.
Alex Cochrane 6
A decent showing at wing-back but limited offensively. Managed Tavernier and Diallo well enough but Wright caused problems.
Nathaniel Atkinson 6
A really tough afternoon with Kent and Bassey constantly flying forward, but stood up to the test. Did everything he could to try and drive his side forward.
Peter Haring 6
Battled all afternoon in the middle of the park. A warrior for the Hearts team but couldn’t dictate play or really get a foothold on the game.
Cameron Devlin 6
Relentless pressing and effort in the engine room but again struggled to show his creativity or attacking play as Rangers after break.
Barrie McKay 5
Much quieter than he’d have liked. Has bags of ability but wasn’t able to show it at Hampden.
Ellis Simms 6
Effective in the first-half winning headers and holding the ball up well. Inches away from opener with sliding effort off post after ten minutes.
Liam Boyce 6
Fit enough to start and gave everything until his substitution. Some tidy period of play but unable to find a clear chance for himself.
Andy Halliday (for Boyce, 76) 4
On for closing stages and extra-time.
Josh Ginnelly (for McKay, 82) 4
Industrious but lacked service.
Gary Mackay-Steven (for Cochrane, 100) 3
Quiet in his cameo.
Aaron McEneff (for Devlin, 105) 3
On for final minutes
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here