Stephen Kingsley v James Tavernier
Both players are nominal defenders but it is their attacking contributions that make them so effective for their respective teams, and it should be fascinating to see how this contest unfolds at the national stadium.
Hearts’ left wing-back is coming off the back of a fine campaign in the capital and Kingsley’s boundless enthusiasm down the flank could result in the Rangers captain finding himself pinned back.
Conversely, the reverse is also true: if Tavernier can gain the upper hand and limit Kingsley’s attacking forays forward, he will go a long way to aiding his side’s chances of lifting the cup.
Liam Boyce v Connor Goldson
Hearts’ Northern Irish striker is the club’s top scorer this season and although he had to be brought off during last week’s 3-1 defeat to Rangers after picking up a knock, the 31-year-old has vowed to be fighting fit for this afternoon’s match.
It makes for an intriguing match-up with Connor Goldson, who played the full 120 minutes in Seville on Wednesday night as the Ibrox club lost the Europa League final on penalties. Goldson’s stamina is remarkable but he is still human and could be a little tired – and if he and Boyce aren’t quite 100 per cent, it could make for a compelling contest.
Cameron Devlin v Ryan Jack
Devlin has been a fine addition to Robbie Neilson’s side and the midfielder’s all-action displays have played an important part in Hearts’ successful season so far. The Australian will be key in both attacking and defensive phases of play, and Van Bronckhorst will be keen to put the brakes on the midfield metronome.
Jack is the most likely candidate to be tasked with hampering Devlin and the Scotland internationalist should be well placed to do so. The 30-year-old played 74 minutes against Eintracht Frankfurt so should have a little more left in the tank than some of his team-mates, and whoever comes out on top of this particular duel will gain a crucial advantage in the middle of the park.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here