TONY SIBBICK says that Hearts were denied a ‘blatant’ free-kick in the build-up to Celtic’s equaliser in his side’s 4-1 defeat in Glasgow, a moment he felt turned the match in the home side’s favour.
Hearts had taken an early lead at Celtic Park through Ellis Simms, and were managing to frustrate Celtic until Daizen Maeda levelled after half an hour.
Sibbick was furious though that Celtic captain Callum McGregor was not penalised by referee Don Robertson for the challenge on him that led to the hosts winning back the ball, feeling he had clearly been fouled.
“It’s a blatant one,” Sibbick said.
“I haven’t seen it back yet, but he’s came from the side or behind me and just swiped my legs and got the ball.
“I thought the ref was going to give it but he didn’t and they went down the other end and scored.
“It was a key moment at 1-0, we were defending well, they didn’t have space to play.
“If the ref gives that as a foul then we get a set piece and it’s a goal scoring chance for us. But they’ve got the quality to go down the other end and score.
“I tried to talk to the ref but wasn’t trying to listen. He said he won the ball but I think it’s a foul.
“Even the second goal, I think Gino (Josh Ginelly) kicked it on to their player for our throw in but he gave it to them.
“Trying to talk to the ref is tough and, with the crowd behind them as well, he’s going to get influenced. It’s a tough one really.
“When the crowd starts getting frustrated, it can take a toll on the team. Your fans want to win and it was a big game for them.
“They knew what was at stake and so did we. Unfortunately it didn’t pan out the way we wanted.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel