Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s last-minute bid for Chelsea has received serious consideration in the race to buy the Stamford Bridge club, the PA news agency understands.
Todd Boehly’s consortium is understood to remain on course to be confirmed as the preferred bidder and then handed the opportunity to seal a Stamford Bridge takeover.
Britain’s richest man Ratcliffe confirmed a last-ditch £4.25billion offer to buy Chelsea on Friday however, tabled at the very tail-end of the sale process.
Roman Abramovich, pictured, will sell Chelsea after 19 years owning the west London club (Dominic Lipinski/PA)
Ineos owner Ratcliffe carried out extensive due diligence on Chelsea in 2019 only to opt against submitting a formal offer to buy the west London club.
The British billionaire had distanced himself from a bid for Chelsea in early March, with his brother Bob reiterating previous determination at Ineos not to be “dumb money” in football.
But crucially, Ratcliffe never categorically ruled himself out of a bid for the Blues.
Chelsea chiefs are understood to have anticipated a bid from Ratcliffe, the 69-year-old petrochemicals boss who bought Ligue 1 club Nice in 2019.
Stamford Bridge bosses had not expected Ratcliffe to make such a late, dramatic entrance into the race however, with the British tycoon understood to have met with Blues chairman Bruce Buck on Thursday.
The Raine Group has overseen the sale process for Chelsea, with the New York merchant bank yet to comment on Los Angeles Dodgers co-owner Boehly’s expected status as preferred bidder.
Graffiti close to Stamford Bridge shows the strength of feeling around Chelsea’s sale after owner Roman Abramovich was sanctioned by the UK Government (Yui Mok/PA)
Eldridge Industries chairman and chief executive Boehly now stands in pole position to buy Chelsea from Roman Abramovich.
But it is understood there would be nothing to stop Abramovich and Chelsea striking a deal with Ratcliffe, other than the race against time.
Chelsea need the sale complete by the end of May, after Abramovich was sanctioned by the UK Government on March 10.
The Russian-Israeli billionaire put the Blues officially up for sale on March 2, amid Russia’s continued invasion of Ukraine.
Downing Street then claimed to have proven Abramovich’s links to Russian president Vladimir Putin when sanctioning the 55-year-old.
Chelsea have been forced to operate under strict Government licensing terms since Abramovich’s sanctions, and the Treasury will have to ratify the club’s sale as the final step in the eventual takeover deal.
Boehly has paired up with fellow Dodgers owner Mark Walter, British businessman Jonathan Goldstein, Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss and US investment firm Clearlake Capital in his consortium offer for the Blues.
Former British Airways chairman Sir Martin Broughton and Boston Celtics co-owner Steve Pagliuca had made Raine Group’s final three-strong shortlist, but both parties were informed their bids had failed on Friday.
The Chicago Cubs-owning Ricketts family-led consortium withdrew a bid boasting major financial firepower on March 15.
Matchday minus one! 👌 pic.twitter.com/wTlxbwPrhq
— Chelsea FC (@ChelseaFC) April 30, 2022
Chelsea will make the trip to Goodison Park to take on former boss Frank Lampard’s Everton on Sunday, with the Blues inching closer to a third-place Premier League finish.
They drew 1-1 at Manchester United on Thursday, as Cristiano Ronaldo’s strike cancelled out a fine effort from Marcos Alonso.
Reece James’ curling effort struck the bar as Chelsea chased the win at Old Trafford, leaving the England wing-back lamenting his missed opportunity.
“I knew straight away that I probably should have scored,” James told Chelsea’s official club website.
“Life goes on and we have another game soon but it’s a tough point.
“We had more chances in the second half but again we didn’t take them.
“I can do more when I’m higher up and not at centre-back. I am happy to help the team.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here