LIVINGSTONE have asked supporters for their views on VAR - but manager David Martindale is in no doubt Scottish referees need the help.
Martindale has a fresh reason to back the technology after Kevin Clancy failed to give his side a ‘stonewall’ penalty against St Johnstone last weekend that could end up costing his side a top-six finish.
The Lions go into tomorrow’s home encounter with Motherwell knowing they need to win to have any chance of finishing in the top half of the table for the third year running.
Martindale is focusing his energies on that short-term goal but has revealed it took him some time to get over his anger from last Saturday’s 1-0 defeat at McDiarmid Park.
The Almondvale boss has this week been in communication with the Scottish FA’s head of referees, Crawford Allan, and accepts Clancy’s error was in no way deliberate.
But, while he admits VAR will not remove debate over some contentious decisions, he is convinced the vote should be passed when clubs are balloted on April 19.
He said: “I sent an email [to the SFA] on Sunday after I had tried to calm myself down. I could have done it on Saturday night but [my wife] Martha told me to sleep on it.
“I went to bed at 1am and got up at 6am and had the dog out for two hours. He didn’t even want to go for a walk! We were walking around Inverleith Park with folk looking at us as if we were weird!
“I got the reply from Crawford Allan and as always it was very balanced. I don’t think Kevin is biased, he made a mistake.
“If we had VAR would he have given us that penalty? I think he would have.
"I don’t think any referee at any level goes out to be biased. But it was a big mistake and it’s like when a goalkeeper makes a big mistake, it is going to be spoken about.
“But I think the referees need VAR. We need to help them. The game is far quicker and more powerful. So I think they need a hand because the game has evolved.
“Will we still have debates with VAR? Probably. But I also think we’ll get more decisions right than we are at the moment.”
Livingston’s failure to make the top-six this weekend - they are eighth but would go above Motherwell in fifth if they win the teams’ head-to-head - would cost the West Lothian club much-needed finance.
But if they do make it, Martindale admits he will revel in again proving people wrong.
Livi were tipped to be relegated at the start of the season and the Lions boss was questioned when he boldly stated ‘for a fact’ his team would not be relegated way back in August.
He added: “We know we need to win to get in the top-six, so that’s what we’re going to try to do.
“If we get top-six I’ll probably spend Saturday night trying to find all the tweets from everyone so I can actively chase them! That would be nice!
“I keep saying every pre-season, ‘I need to remember that one’. Then you forget after two weeks!
“I think it would be a huge testament to everyone at the football club. We’re a close-knit team here. There’s a lot of people here who work closely together, it would be huge for everyone.
“But if we don’t get in we still have to put the season into context. My aim this year was to finish 10th and stay in the league, and we’re on course to do that.
“But it would be massive to get into the top-six.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here