FORMER Celtic striker Davie Provan has slammed current chairman Ian Bankier for his comments about Scottish referees at the club's AGM on Wednesday.
Bankier was asked by a supporter about incidents involving officials Bobby Madden and Nick Walsh, with the Parkhead chair admitting the contentious calls were a "source of deep concern".
When pressed on whether he had concerns over Walsh, who will officiate Saturday's League Cup semi-final between Ange Postecoglou's side and St Johnstone, Bankier continued: "We don't run the SFA.
“We are a member club of which there are others and we get our shout, we get our say.
“You can't expect us with a flick of the wrist to tell the SFA what to do and what not to do. We don't run the game."
Provan, appearing on the Go Radio Football Show, questioned the "grandstanding" from Bankier as he urged the Celtic chief to provide clarity on the cause of his concern.
"Where I do have a position is Ian Bankier criticising a referee before a game," Provan said.
"What is that about? That's grandstanding, that's all that is. It's just trying to appease a section of the support.
"Is he trying to say the referee is biased or...? What is he trying to say here?"
Provan went on to criticise majority shareholder Dermot Desmond for not attending the AGM and called for "new blood" on the Parkhead board.
"I don’t think it’s a good look," he said of Desmond's absence.
"I know Celtic is a small part of the Desmond business empire but with the amount of people that care about the club, I think he could make an effort to turn up and show his face.
"It would go down well with supporters.
"It just doesn't look good when he's skipping it. As for Ian Bankier saying he's going to back Postecoglou... I'm not sure the supporters pay too much attention to what Mr Bankier says.
"I would really like, in the fullness of time, to see more support influence on the Celtic board.
"A lot of them have been there for too long. They failed the club recently, failed the club badly by getting complacent.
"The board as well as the team needs new blood."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel