St Johnstone chairman Steve Brown has addressed the sale of Ali McCann which left fans furious on deadline day.
McCann departed McDiarmid Park along with captain Jason Kerr on the final day of the window and supporters let their club know exactly how they felt at the news via social media.
Mr Brown, though, took to the club website to clarify the club's position and reveal that initially they had absolutely no intention to sell the Northern Irishman.
The club actually knocked back three offers for the player before the youngster himself told the club he wanted to move on to test himself at a higher level. And rather than keep hold of a wantaway star they opted to accept Preston's final offer which surpasses £1.75million.
The statement read: "Following on from the closure of the summer transfer window on Tuesday evening, I thought it only right and proper to give our supporters the facts behind the departures of Jason Kerr and Ali McCann.
"In terms of our Captain, Wigan Athletic met our valuation. From a Club and, in particular, a financial point of view, it was an offer we could not turn down.
"Also, for Jason, we could not stand in his way. He was an excellent leader and a first-class individual.
"I thought Jason was going to be the only one that we sold. We turned down numerous bids for several of our key players during July and August.
"I feel it's vital to explain how this deal came about and how we reached our final decision.
"Most importantly, we had no intentions to sell Ali in this window.
"I met with the Manager at McDiarmid Park from 4pm on Tuesday. At that moment, after reluctantly accepting Jason's decision to leave, two offers came in for Ali, which were both rejected.
"An increased offer came in from Preston around 5pm, which was also turned down.
"Shortly after this, it was made abundantly clear to Callum and I that Ali wanted to move on, and from a footballing perspective, challenge himself at a higher level.
"We were also made aware that the financial package which had been offered to him was life-changing and potentially a once in a lifetime opportunity.
"I sat with the Manager and assessed the dilemma we had.
"Would we stand in the way of a player's development and prohibit him from being set up financially for life?
"Or do we decline that to have potentially an unhappy player who would no doubt have left in January?
"After a long, difficult conversation between Callum and I, we decided to let Ali go.
"We subsequently reopened dialogue with Preston and renegotiated to get the overall transfer fee we wanted to achieve.
"With the add ons, it will surpass the value of £1.75million which we put on him back in May. That money will be reinvested back into the Football Department.
"I must stress this was never an easy decision, but with regards to Ali, both Callum and I have a clear conscience.
"We have also kept our policy intact whereby we nurture young players in our fantastic Youth Academy, send them out on loan and develop them in the first team.
"That tried and tested process provides them with a platform to kick on in their career.
"It is of paramount importance to us to keep this policy intact as other players watching on can see that we are not a club that will block their development path.
"I hope this information is insightful and gives you a clear understanding of how decisions are made.
"Like you, I am a St Johnstone supporter, but I often have to remove that from the thought process and take all things into consideration when making vital decisions.
"I now look forward to you welcoming our three new signings - Ali Crawford, Lars Dendoncker and Cammy MacPherson - and giving them your full backing in the weeks and months ahead.
"We also hope to have Eetu Vertainen's work Permit granted by the end of the week and we are sure he will also be an excellent addition to Callum's squad.
"As ever, thank you all for your support and understanding."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel