The 100m is often deemed the blue ribbon Olympic event, marking the fastest men and women in the world.
On the biggest stage, a false start is most athletes biggest fear and can change the entire outcome of the race.
Linford Christie is one of GB's most famous athletes who fell foul to the false start back in 1996.
However, the rules have changed since Atlanta, so here's everything you need to know about the false start rule in athletics.
What is the false start rule in athletics?
Currently in athletics, one false start equals instant disqualification.
The rule changed in 2010; previously one false start resulted in a warning to the entire field, while a second led to disqualification regardless of the athlete.
It meant that one athlete could false start without disqualification, but if there was a second by another athlete, the racer responsible would be instantly disqualified.
Now, anyone who false starts will be disqualified immediately.
The rule changed in part due to scheduling issues, because false starts made it impossible to keep to prearranged times.
However, speculation over some runners deliberately false starting to load pressure onto racers who were fast out of the blocks also contributed to the decision.
A false start is registered when an athlete moves faster than 0.1 seconds after the gun.
Since the new rule was introduced, the number of false starts at major events has reduced hugely.
When a false start has occurred, the starter will shoot the gun twice to inform the field.
The referee will then hold up a red card to the offending athlete.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel