Scotland and the Czech Republic are both evenly matched on paper with many key battles in both attack and defence important factors in winning the game.
Here at Herald and Times Sport we've looked at both sides' squads to determine the three key battles which could determine the game’s outcome.
Andy Robertson vs Lukas Masopust
Robertson is undoubtedly a pivotal player in both Scotland’s attack and defence. He will more than likely be marauding forward trying to whip balls into the box for physical strikers like Lyndon Dykes.
The high pressing nature of the Liverpool defender will leave Czech winger Lukas Masopust confident of catching him out on the break.
With his electric pace and proven finishing ability, the Slavia Prague winger could be a dangerman for the Czechs and Robbo will have to be at his best defensively to stop him breaching the back-line.
John McGinn vs Tomas Soucek
Both have been top figures for their Premier League clubs last season, each enjoying a good campaign of domestic and international football and both capable of dictating the pace of a game.
Ex-Hibs midfielder McGinn is essential in the heart of Steve Clarke’s side, stringing passes together and transitioning from defence to attack. Meanwhile, Soucek is similarly important for the Czechs, a defensive midfielder first and foremost, but equally capable of creating or scoring a goal himself.
It can be expected that these two will lock horns throughout the Group D clash and whoever plays better could dictate the final result.
Che Adams vs Vladimir Coufal
The pace of Che Adams has been a welcome sight in the attacking area for the nation. Capable of sprinting past centre-halves and full-backs alike, Adams can provide a quick option for a counter-attack.
One man who will stand in Adams’ way as he looks to breach the defence though is West Ham’s Vladimir Coufal.
Rather quick himself, and an experienced defender, Coufal will fancy his chances at keeping the pacey forward at bay and Adams will need a little extra bit of quality to get the better of him.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here