The tournament organisers remain hopeful that the Rainbow Cup can go ahead as planned between 24th April and 19th June despite the four South African teams involved – the Bulls, Sharks, Lions and Stormers – being told that they won’t be granted visas by the UK government.
While Covid concerns mean that the South African franchises will stay at home and play against each other during the first three rounds of the competition, the plan is for them to then be based in Bristol and commute from there to their games in Scotland, Ireland, Wales and Italy during rounds four to six.
The problem appears to be with current restrictions on travel between South Africa and England, so a solution might be to move the base to somewhere else in the UK.
However, South Africa is also one of the countries on Ireland’s mandatory hotel quarantine list – which doesn’t currently provide exemption for professional sports athletes – so that could also be a big obstacle to getting the tournament played.
Sharks CEO Eduard Coetzee told South African press yesterday that the franchises had been advised to not proceed with their visa applications. “We have little information at this stage, but it seems to be the case that the Rainbow Cup will be cancelled,” he said
Cancelling the Rainbow Cup – which has been organised as a one-off 'bridge' tournament ahead of the four South African franchises joining the PRO14 next season – would have significant financial implications in terms of lost broadcast and advertising revenue. It will also deprive British and Irish Lions hopefuls of valuable game-time ahead of this summer's tour (currently planned for South Africa, travel restrictions permitting). So, it seems likely that the competition will go ahead in some sort of abbreviated format, even if the withdrawal of the Bulls, Sharks, Lions and Stormers heavily diminishes its appeal and credibility.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here