THE possibility of a Celtic return for David Marshall has moved a step closer after the goalkeeper’s current club, Wigan Athletic, went into administration yesterday.
Marshall, who left Celtic back in 2007, has one year left on his contract at the DW Stadium, but the English Championship side are understood to be willing to accept a cut-price fee for the Scotland number one as they become the first high-profile casualty of the coronavirus shutdown in football.
Marshall is believed to be keen on a move back to Glasgow with his family still based in the city, from where the 35-year-old has been commuting south this season, and with Celtic’s bid to bring Fraser Forster back to the club now looking doomed, his chances of a return to the place where he started his career have improved.
Forster, who spent last season on loan at Celtic Park, has been told by Southampton coach Ralph Hasenhuttl that he will get an opportunity to contest the number one position at St Mary’s, and has two years still remaining on a contract worth a reported £70,000 a week.
The 32-year-old is understood to have wanted a permanent move to Celtic this summer, but he now looks set to stay with the English Premier League outfit for the time-being at least.
With Scott Bain the only recognised senior goalkeeper on Celtic’s books at present, manager Neil Lennon is keen to strengthen the position quickly, and has also been linked with a move for former England number one Joe Hart, who is a free agent following his release from Burnley.
But it is believed that Marshall also figures prominently on his list of potential targets, and while no formal contact has been made between the parties, both would be keen to discuss the possibility of a reunion.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here