NEIL LENNON says he is in favour of VAR despite the technology working against Celtic in their Europa League tie against Copenhagen.
Ryan Christie was penalised for a handball in the area that was initially missed by referee Sergei Karasev, with the Russian official awarding a penalty to the home side after checking the incident on the pitch-side monitor. The spot-kick was subsequently saved by Fraser Forster.
Lennon wasn’t overly impressed by the pressure placed upon the referee to consult VAR by Copenhagen manager Stale Solbakken as he whipped up the home crowd, but he concedes it was the correct call, and says that the introduction of the technology in Scotland would be beneficial.
“It’s for the good of the game and the good of the referee,” Lennon said.
“I have no complaints. It was unfortunate for us, but if it was for me, I’d have been screaming penalty.
“Their manager was cheerleading the crowd. We were watching it as well and your heart is sinking.
“But with Fraser Forster in goal you never know what can happen and he’s made another brilliant save.”
Celtic centre-back Kristoffer Ajer echoed his manager’s viewpoint on VAR, with the defender believing that the cost of bringing it into Scottish football would be well worth it in order to give our referees as much help as possible to get big calls correct.
“VAR is a good thing,” said Ajer. “You get to deal with the facts. That can only be a good thing and I don’t have any problem with VAR.
“Okay, it cost us a penalty but it’s important to get the right decisions, whether it’s offsides or penalties or whatever.
“In Denmark it cost us a penalty and a booking but that’s fine, that’s how it goes, and you have to accept it.
“It might have gone against us but there will be times when it goes the other way.
“I know there is a lot of discussion about bringing VAR to Scotland. A lot of the talk is about how much it will cost but you see it in so many countries, of course it would be good to have it in Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel