DEREK McInnes insisted last night that referee Euan Anderson wrongly sent off Sam Cosgrove for a “brilliant tackle” on Kris Ajer during Celtic’s Ladbrokes Premiership win at Parkhead – and claimed opposite number Neil Lennon agreed it wasn’t a red card.
Celtic had just re-established their lead at 2-1 when the big English striker ran 20 yards to slide in on Ajer, winning the ball in a manner which referee Anderson felt was endangering his opponent. McInnes, on the other hand, accused Ajer of gamesmanship and said the sending off gave them a mountain to climb to get a result.
“The ref had a good game but it’s a poor decision,” said McInnes. “People have already put it in the same bracket as Ryan Porteous’ tackle but it’s nothing like it. Porteous clearly made contact with the player. I’ve watched Sam’s 50 times and he’s won the ball cleanly.
“If he goes in at speed and hits the player, you can understand the sending off,” he added. “You have to make sure you get the ball and 100 per cent, it’s a brilliant tackle. He probably doesn’t need to go in as quick but he gets it cleanly.
“If Sam hits Ajer at that speed, Ajer’s hurt. And he’s clearly not hurt. Big Ajer was laughing and winking at him lying on the ground. There was nothing wrong with the boy, he carried on.
“Did the reaction of Celtic’s players influence the ref’s decision? Who knows. But I’ve just spoken to Lenny and the first thing he said to me was that, no way was it a red card. Even he thinks we’ve been harshly treated there.
“I’m not saying it would have changed the result but it certainly gives us a better chance if Cosgrove stays on the pitch. VAR could have helped us but you still need the ref to make the right decision. He thinks Sam led with his leg and caught the player as well. But he hasn’t.”
Lennon left his media duties to assistant John Kennedy. “I don’t think he fully catches him, he just nicks him,” says Kennedy. “But in the modern game when you fly in at that speed, and there is a form of recklessness about it, you give the ref a decision to make and in his eyes it was a red card.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here