STEVEN Gerrard acknowledged last night that Alfredo Morelos’ first dismissal of a previously-blemish free season against Motherwell was a blow - but insisted referee Don Roberson had been “desperate” to send someone off during Rangers’ 2-0 win at Fir Park.
Whilst the Rangers manager had “no complaints” about the match official’s decision to dismiss the 23-year-old for two bookings – the first was for catching Jake Carroll then the second was for gesturing to the home fans after he scored his 27th of the season – he said he wished referees would take the abuse players receive from the stands into account.
While Morelos was showered with missiles such as cups of Bovril, coins and a lighter after the gesture, the Englishman felt the card was coming and had been trying to substitute his striker beforehand. He confirmed that Morelos would be fined in addition to being forced to sit out Friday night’s Premiership meeting with Hibs at Easter Road on Friday.
“It is a setback today, he knows that, we know that,” said Gerrard. “But let’s not forget how much of an improvement there has been. We will reset him and I’m sure he will be fine because he hates missing football matches. I’m sure he hates getting punished in the pocket so hopefully he will get back on the horse and continue to improve in that area. Unfortunately, the supporters and his team-mates will suffer because he’s not available for the next game.
“I think officials need to take [abuse from the stands] into consideration at times,” he added. “There had been a bit of a commotion between both sets of players, although there wasn’t much in it. However, when I saw the referee book Ryan Jack and Declan Gallagher I thought he was waiting for a moment. We have no complaints ... but I felt he was desperate to give out a red card today. I had that feeling, which is unfortunate as our player does get that type of abuse. We tried to take him off ... because he was already on a yellow but also because we were flashing balls across the six-yard box and I felt someone with a bit of nous and experience would get a tap-in.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel