ALLAN MCGREGOR Left exposed by his defence for the Feyenoord goals but showed his importance to Rangers with a series of impressive stops. 8
JAMES TAVERNIER Capable of much better – as he showed in brief moments – in the final third but crosses from the right and set pieces weren't good enough overall. Frustrating night. 6
CONNOR GOLDSON Will be disappointed at the manner of the Feyenoord goals and a handful of chances the hosts carved out. Decent in the main. 6
FILIP HELANDER Made a couple of good blocks but there were errors – especially for the second Feyenoord goal – in there as well. Unfortunate with the deflection that allowed Toornstra to open the scoring. 6
BORNA BARISIC Gave boss Gerrard a boost as he proved his fitness but will be disappointed with his part in the opening goal. Stuck to his task and made some key challenges. 6
STEVEN DAVIS Wasn’t able to dictate the play as expected in the first period but set the wheels in motion for the leveller with a lovely pass to Kent. Improved in the second half. 7
RYAN JACK Grew into the game and became increasingly influential as he looked to drive Rangers on from midfield. Tried his luck with a couple of strikes. 7
GLEN KAMARA Well off the pace in the first half and was partly culpable at the opening goal. Booked for a foul on Berghuis. Better after the break but not at his best. 5
SHEYI OJO Given the nod to start on the right but offered very little. Can have no complaints about being replaced. 5
RYAN KENT Showed a couple of nice touches early on but couldn’t hurt Feyenoord before a teasing cross was headed home by Morelos. A good showing overall. 7
ALFREDO MORELOS Starved of service in a frustrating first 45 minutes but header to make it 1-1 was another clinical finish. His second was just as impressive on another terrific night for the striker. 8
Substitutes:
SCOTT ARFIELD Gave Rangers fresh legs but couldn’t win it late on. 3
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here