GLASGOW'S Kash Farooq last night demanded a rematch from Edinburgh’s Lee McGregor after losing his British bantamweight title to the Commonwealth champ at the Emirates Arena on Saturday on a controversial split decision.
Two judges delivered a 114-113 scorecard, with one in favour of Farooq and the other voting for McGregor. However, it was the 115-112 verdict for McGregor from Mark Lyson which had punters at ringside and armchair fight fans rubbing their eyes in disbelief, particularly since McGregor had had a point deducted by referee Victor Loughlin in the 10th round for repeated holding.
Many observers felt that McGregor needed a knock-out to come out on top after that and he certainly put in a strong finish but Farooq was stunned when he heard the scores.
READ MORE: Chris Bungard ready to put on a show at Bellator- with Kieran Tierney ring walk starting night off
“Going into the final round, we thought we had it in the bag but I didn’t come out with all guns blazing or do anything silly,” he said. “In didn’t think I had to win the round, just get through it.
“I feel that I did more than enough to win but my title’s been taken away from me and I’m gutted by that. It’s part and parcel of boxing, though.
“If Lee stays at bantamweight then I want a rematch. However, I don’t expect him to give me one; he’ll either move on or move up a weight. Maybe I’ll get him again further down the line but I’m all right – there’s no point in feeling sorry for myself it or crying about it because that’s not going to help me.
“Right now I’m going to take a few days off but then I’ll be back in the gym, back before he is. I’ve got the hunger and the fire in my belly.”
Farooq’s manager, Iain Wilson, revealed afterwards that Farooq won’t climb into the ring until April after training for four title fights in the last year.
BBC Scotland’s Sports Twitter account was inundated with messages from boxing fans, with the vast majority of them ridiculing the judges’ assessments.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here