SCOTLAND are in talks with their English counterparts about an historic one-day cricket international between the countries at Lord’s, while also preparing to welcome Australia and New Zealand to Edinburgh next summer.
The Auld Enemy have never met competitively on English soil and Cricket Scotland chief executive Malcolm Cannon has been making the case.
He said: “I’ve spoken to my opposite number at the ECB [England and Wales Cricket Board] numerous times about this. Put it on at Lord’s and Scots would fill the place. There are probably more of us living in London than in Edinburgh so why not?
“England’s schedule is really busy but all we’re looking for is one day. And we will go to them. To be able to walk out at Lord’s for an England v Scotland game would just be incredible.”
The ECB’s control of Cricket Scotland’s broadcasting rights comes to an end this year and Cannon, who will leave his post next month after four years, says the extra finance could make a huge difference to his successor.
“For the last seven years England has owned our broadcast rights,” he said. “That finishes on December 31 so the new chief executive has the ability to negotiate a new deal with whoever they want.
“Of course you need content to broadcast and we’ve got New Zealand next year guaranteed and Australia 80 per cent over the line.
“Sky and BBC between them are going to be paying £255m a year for England’s matches from 2020 so that’s a £1bn deal over four years. Even if we only got one per cent of that, that would still be £2.5m a year. Those sorts of figures would be transformational.”
Scotland are edging closer to becoming a full member of the ICC themselves and Cannon says the financial benefits would be significant.
“Ireland went from receiving £1m a year from the ICC [International Cricket Council] to £5m after becoming a full member. So overnight we’d go from a £2m turnover business to £6m. There are still one or two boxes we need to tick but we’re closer than we’ve ever been.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here