SCOTT McKENNA could have easily thrown his toys out the pram. With the English transfer deadline approaching, Aberdeen continued to knock back approaches from Sheffield Wednesday, Queens Park Rangers and Nottingham Forest.
Up until even 5pm on Thursday when the window closed, it wasn’t clear whether McKenna would play for Aberdeen in Rijeka. But seeing as no club matched the Pittodrie board’s valuation of the defender, he started in Croatia as Aberdeen lost 2-0 in the Europa League third round qualifier.
McKenna was keen to move away from the north-east this summer, but despite the frustration of not being allowed to depart, he fulfilled his duties as Aberdeen player and was one of their better individuals on a disappointing night in the Balkans.
Joe Lewis has watched as McKenna’s stock has continued to rise since making his breakthrough in September 2017 and is not surprised.
READ MORE: James McPake issues Kane Hemmings challenge to be quick off the mark
“You would never have known [about the situation] with the way Scott played. Scott’s attitude is one of his main positives. Things don’t affect him and I think you could see that with his performance in Rijeka – he can be proud of the way he played.
“I am amazed there hasn’t been a lot more interest in Scott. For me, as a defender, he is one of the best I have played with. There is no doubt there will be loads of interest in Scott going forward. He is a great lad and a complete a professional.
“I have spoken to Scott about the situation, but that conversation will remain in-house. He doesn’t need me to tell him how to act. He is a sensible lad and he will do what is best for him to take his career to the next level.”
Aberdeen have a huge mountain to climb after falling to a two-goal defeat in Rijeka. Shay Logan was at fault for the opener, conceding a penalty by pulling over Luka Capan as he burst into the box.
Lewis, however, believes Spanish referee Ricardo De Burgos was wrong to point to the spot, as he was set to take control of the ball.
“The ball was going straight into my hands,” he said. “It was never in danger with regards any of their players. I have looked at it again on the video and it doesn’t look like a penalty. I am not sure what view the referee had but he has seen something that he thought was a penalty and blew very quickly.
“It came at a time where I wouldn’t say we were comfortable but I didn’t feel they had anything to unlock our defence. It gave them a lift.
READ MORE: Partick Thistle 1 Dundee United 2: Misery deepens as Caldwell's men fail to shackle Shankland
“There is no time to think of it as an injustice. Yes, it is disappointing but it is half time and we take them back to Pittodrie next Wednesday. If we can create a good atmosphere there and we can get the first goal then I think that would give us a real momentum going forward, especially with the crowd behind us.”
Robert Muric’s late strike to give the Croats a comfortable advantage should be enough to see them through to the playoff round, but Lewis has not given up hope.
He said: “We felt the game was going well for us but the penalty changed that and gave them a real lift. The second goal was a killer. He is a decent player and maybe we should have stopped him from coming in on his left foot and that was the only disappointment for us in terms of poor play or not following the game plan.
“I felt we played well and 2-0 was a harsh scoreline. We need to make sure when we get them back to Pittodrie we put on a performance that can get us the result we need to get through the tie.”
Aberdeen got their Ladbrokes campaign off to a positive start with victory over Hearts last weekend and they are aiming for another three points tomorrow against St Mirren.
“It is important we keep our league run going," he said. "We need to keep that positivity and we can’t beat ourselves up too much over Thursday. We are disappointed [but] we need to come back out and show what a good team we are.
“They will be difficult opposition. It is difficult to have so many games and so many different types of games early but hopefully we have the squad to cope.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here