GEORGE Peat has denied the structure of the SFA requires to be radically overhauled in order to end Scotland’s agonising wait to reach the finals of a major tournament.
The disappointing start that the national team have made to their Euro 2020 campaign – they lost their opening game 3-0 to Kazakhstan away last month - has reduced their chances of finishing in the top two in Group I.
It has also brought the governance of the game in this country into sharp focus and led to calls for the current system – which sees officials, often from small provincial clubs, rise to important positions, including the presidency, simply as the result of their years or service – to be done away with.
However, Peat, who commissioned former First Minister Henry McLeish to carry out a wide-ranging review of Scottish football during his time as SFA president back in 2010, doesn’t believe that any change is required.
“At the end of the day, who becomes the vice-president or the president is voted on by the clubs,” he said. “It isn’t as if they just walk in. They need 90 odd votes to get them in. The president has to be voted in by the clubs.
READ MORE: George Peat: The SFA made a mess of Alex McLeish’s appointment – it was amateurish and botched
“It has changed considerably since I first got involved in the SFA. We had committees for everything under the sun. It used to take weeks and weeks to get a decision made.
“It had been done like that for 100 years. I got Henry McLeish in to review the whole thing. What he came up with was revolutionary in the eyes of the people who were involved in the SFA compared to what it used to be like. Now if the compliance officer views that something is worthy of a punishment a decision is made within a week.
“People think the SFA just run the international team. I have been away for eight years now, but at that time we were running a £50m business. We weren’t just running an international side.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here