BRENDAN Rodgers last night expressed hope he will be remembered for the unprecedented success he enjoyed at Celtic when the anger over his sudden departure subsides – and revealed he would like to manage the Parkhead club again in future.
Rodgers spoke publicly yesterday for the first time since agreeing to take over at Premier League club Leicester City earlier this week and addressed the fallout there has been to his shock exit.
There has been a furious reaction to the Northern Irishman, whose side is bidding to win a historic treble treble, leaving before the end of the season among incensed Celtic supporters.
READ MORE: Mikey Devlin relishes Alfredo Morelos battle against Rangers
At the Ladbrokes Premiership game against Hearts at Tynecastle on Wednesday night, ultra group The Green Brigade unfurled banners which read: “You traded immortality for mediocrity. Never a Celt. Always a fraud.”
The double treble winners have since condemned a video of a group of fans chanting vile songs about Rodgers in a pub in Edinburgh that has been posted on social media as “pathetic and disgusting”.
However, Rodgers revealed that he had asked to remain in Glasgow until the end of the 2018/19 campaign and stressed that it was Leicester, who paid £5 million compensation to secure his services, who had insisted he move now.
“It was never the case,” he said. “I had a frank and amicable talk here. It just wasn’t something that they wanted to do. That will be verified by Peter (Celtic chief executive Lawwell) who spoke to Leicester. Speak to Peter. Peter will tell you categorically Leicester said that was their position.
“It is unfortunate there will be rumours, but the actual reality is when they came in Peter rang me and said: ‘Listen, Leicester have said you’re their man, they don’t want to wait until the summer’.
“He asked them as well. So that’s when I went to speak to them. Peter will confirm that as well. That was the conversation because he relayed that to me.
READ MORE: Neil Lennon: Brendan Rodgers up there with Celtic greats
“I know the truth. If there’s a narrative around something else I can’t control that. Like I say, Leicester made the approach to the club and were very clear, they were prepared to pay big compensation to take me out, I was their candidate.”
Rodgers added: "That was something I asked. Could it wait until the summer? But they felt it couldn't. So I then have to make a decision.
"There was no way I was wanting to do what I did, with 11 games to go, in a cup quarter-final and having won a trophy. Everybody could see my passion in my last home game against Motherwell.
"But very quickly that night, there was an approach and I had to deal with it. You have a choice to make then but waiting until the summer was one of the things I'd asked.
"It (Rodgers staying at Celtic until the summer) was beyond what Leicester wanted to do and you can understand their position. There were 10 or 11 games to go and they have top players here, who were unsure of where the club is going. They need to make a statement, show ambition and maybe look to keep some of the players.
READ MORE: Alan Stubbs believes Brendan Rodgers may regret Celtic exit
"I know we succeeded at Celtic. And ultimately that’s the measure I look at. Hopefully that is what I'll be remembered for. Time will be a healer."
Rodgers, who won all seven domestic trophies that Celtic competed for during his time in Scotland and led his side into the Champions League group stages twice, described the reaction from some supporters as “sad”.
He admitted he would like to return to the Glasgow club he had grown up in Carnlough in County Antrim supporting on good terms in future and even revealed he would consider going back as manager one day.
“I would be hugely, hugely disappointed if I never could (go back to Parkhead),” he said. “I would be incredibly disappointed if I never could after everything that I’ve given. If that was the case then . . .
“Would I work in Scotland again? Of course I would. I loved every single second of being there. When it calms down in maybe 10 years I could maybe go back to Celtic. Absolutely. 100 per cent.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel