Celtic made sure a controversial Motherwell goal become notable only for game show clips after late strikes from Odsonne Edouard and Oliver Burke ensured they maintain their eight-point lead at the top of the table.
Having been in easy street through first-half goals from Scott Sinclair and Edouard, the visitors pulled a goal back in bizarre circumstances shortly after the restart.
Flouting the traditional but unwritten rule of giving the ball back to the opposition when it has come out to allow treatment, Motherwell had netted through Gboly Ariyibi following teenager James Scott's run.
Kristoffer Ajer had knocked the ball out for treatment to be given to the grounded Ryan Christie as Jack Hendry waited at the touchline to come on. Ajer had signalled to Christie as he played the ball out, clearly indicting his reason for shuffling the ball out of play.
Before the substitution could be made, however, Motherwell’s Liam Grimshaw took the throw-in quickly towards Scott while the home side expected the ball to be passed straight back to them.
Scott's effort was parried by Bain but the rebound was netted bt Ariyibi much to the chagrin of Celtic. Ajer and Dedryck Boyata were fuming - Ajer all the way through the remainder of the game - but subsequent goals from Edouard who sunk an exquisite free-kick off the underside of the bar and substitute Oliver Burke, made the controversial moment a talking point and nothing more.
Ewan Henderson made his first senior start too and impressed throughout with some clever touches. The youngster claimed the official man of the match award with the expectancy being that he will be seen a little more regularly as the season progresses.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel