OH, but to be a fly on the wall when Michael O’Neill, sometime in the very near future, sits down opposite the SFA party headed by Stewart Regan.
What can be guaranteed is that the most stringent of interviews is going to take place. No stone unturned, every question will insist on a concise answer and the interviewee better have all facts, figure and the rest at their fingertips.
Or O’Neill will walk away.
Make no mistake; the one who will be asking the big questions will be the Northern Irishman. He is going to interview the SFA. It won’t be the other way around.
It is now obvious Regan and his cohorts view the current Northern Ireland manager as the one, the saviour, who can turnaround the failing fortunes of the Scotland international team.
If they are right, if the 48-year-old from Portadown is indeed the manager to take our country to the European Championship in 2020, then they better not blow it.
Perhaps not since Walter Smith in 2004 has a potential Scotland manager held as much sway when entering into such talks.
O’Neill has options, although he won't go near Sunderland, and so for him to move from his native to adopted country, certain assurances must be given to him.
O’Neill is happy to at least have an informal chat when he will size up what he's letting himself in for. And don’t for a moment think his only concerns will be about what the best eleven is or whether Scott Brown is going to retire again.
Regan and the rest will be asked about their future plans, and the solutions better meet the immovable high standards of their first choice candidate.
If the job does appeal to O'Neill, his remit, in his own eyes, won't only be the senior team.
He will demand to know everything there is to know about the youth development all the way down to the youngster level.
The much-talked about and little understood Project Brave shall be picked over. There is every chance O’Neill and Malky Mackay would have to meet before any hand is shaken.
He wants a four-year deal, the IFA are willing to offer an improved contract beyond 2020 when his current one comes to an end, and his own backroom staff, which will include Hearts assistant Austin McPhee.
O’Neill, who lives in Edinburgh, likes the idea of being Scotland manager. However, he will do his homework and if his potential employees don’t fulfil the required criteria, the SFA may have to turn to someone else, with Paul Lambert second on their wanted list.
Here is a story told to me about how he managed Kyle Lafferty, not the easist character to coach, during the successful 2016 European Championship campaign.
Before every game, O’Neill would place a tablet in his striker’s hands and make him watch footage, no longer than a couple of minutes, of his better moments. This rather simple psychology worked wonders. Lafferty, who then was hiding a serious gambling problem, rewarded his manager with goals and untypical selfless performances.
He was in constant contact with his fringe and injured players – did Gordon Strachan ever do this?
His attention to detail is second to none. Indeed, in an interview with this newspaper, Jimmy Nicholl, who is O’Neill’s right hand man, spoke of the forensic work put in on opponents, with McPhee playing a huge part of this side of things.
What's more, he brought people together.
“Let’s say Catholics, for whatever reason, previously didn’t want to go to Windsor Park because it’s where Linfield play and all the other stuff, and so if more want to come to our games because they now feel part of it then that’s brilliant,” said Nicholl.
“Both sides of the divide can see what’s happening is great. Michael is doing his best to bring everyone with us. If we can fill Windsor Park when it is redeveloped with 22,000 at every game, and from every community, that would be wonderful. It’s what we want to see.”
Of course, just because he once took one small country with limited resources to a European Championship, and was done out of a World Cup by a dreadful refereeing decision, doesn't mean he can do the same for Scotland.
However, O'Neill is a miracle worker. It's exactly what we need.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel