Nemanja Matic said Manchester United need to remain focused until qualification for the Champions League group stage is absolutely certain after a 2-0 win over Benfica put them on the brink.
Benfica's teenage goalkeeper Mile Svilar scored an own goal when Matic's shot hit the post and rebounded on to him before Daley Blind fired in a second-half penalty, leaving United needing just one point from their final two games.
"We have to be focused until the end," Matic said on BT Sport 3. "We have to fight in the last two games and we will go to win both games. I'm sure the team is ready."
Romelu Lukaku, whose scoreless streak extended to six games, had wanted to take the penalty won by Marcus Rashford in the 77th minute, but was overruled first by Ander Herrera and then Blind.
"I'm not sure," Matic said when asked what happened. "I think the manager decided that Daley needed to shoot."
There was a first Champions League start for 20-year-old Scott McTominay, who has been at United since the age of five.
"Obviously as a young boy, growing up you dream of the Champions League and playing for Manchester United," he said. "It's a dream for me and I'm made up we've got the three points and the clean sheet."
Jose Mourinho confirmed it was his decision to have Blind take the penalty ahead of Lukaku, having seen Anthony Martial miss from the spot in the first half.
"Martial was the player to take (penalties), he took one, he missed and he was not even on the pitch (for the second)," he said. "The players were happy to take responsibility, Romelu and Ander the same, but my choice is Blind. It is my decision.
"We train, I analyse, I try to make the right decision. In the last days Martial didn't miss one when taking so many against three good goalkeepers, and he missed, so sometimes the choice is wrong, but I wanted Daley. It was my decision."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel