BRUNO ALVES reckons referee Steven McLean should have given more protection to Rangers during their Betfred Cup semi-final defeat to Motherwell.
Pedro Caixinha’s side crashed to a 2-0 loss at Hampden as the Steelmen emerged victorious from a keenly fought and controversial encounter.
Caixinha and Well boss Stephen Robinson were sent to the stands after the Portuguese complained about an elbow from Ryan Bowman that left Gers stopper Fabio Cardoso with a broken nose.
Whistler McLean made a number of strange calls throughout the match and Alves believes he should have handled proceedings better.
He said: “I think so. The first action of the game was the elbow in Fabio’s face. After that, everything can happen.
“It doesn’t matter [if it is deliberate]. He opened the mouth of Fabio and this is not a good thing. This was the beginning.
“This is not acceptable. I don’t like to find excuses for when we lose but for me it is really disappointing.
Read more: Tam McManus: Going all-in on Caixinha at Rangers hasn’t paid off for Dave King
“This is what happens when this kind of behaviour is allowed to happen from the beginning. You start off playing football and then you are playing other things.
“I am sad because we lost the game and I am sad about what happened. Fabio broke his nose. I am disappointed with this.
“We always come here to play football. We like when football is fast and confrontational but even the first goal is too much. They didn't allow the goalkeeper to come out of the goal.
“This is something that has to change because we want to play football. It was not a good day for us but we will keep on working hard.”
The injury to Cardoso added to Rangers' woes on a disappointing day as they missed out on a final berth and a meeting with Celtic.
And Alves knows the Light Blues have to quickly pick themselves up as attentions turn to the visit of Kilmarnock on Wednesday night.
He said: “It’s the job of the players to work better and harder to play in the coming games. We will try to do better in the next game.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel