Mike Ashley will only sell Newcastle to a buyer who has the financial muscle to invest heavily in the playing squad.
Ashley announced on Monday evening that he will accept structured payments for the Magpies.
Press Association Sport understands the reason for this is to allow a buyer to invest in players at the same time as meeting the overall asking price via instalments.
Newcastle United owner St James Holdings Limited have released this statement #NUFC pic.twitter.com/JMnTuJuis6
— PA Dugout (@PAdugout) October 16, 2017
Sources have indicated that Ashley, who has spent much of his decade in charge at St James’ Park in conflict with large sections of the club’s support, will only do business with a buyer who is able to fund significant spending in a way he admitted recently he cannot do.
As a result, there is no hard and fast price tag. There has been speculation that Ashley is looking for anywhere between £300million and £450million before relinquishing control, but a potential buyer being able to demonstrate a willingness to take the club forward on and off the field would appear to be as important as the price.
Newcastle are understood to have signed non-disclosure agreements with four prospective buyers, all of whom are at similar stages in their ongoing interest with none having reached the stage of making a formal offer.
Amanda Staveley watched Newcastle’s draw with Liverpool (Owen Humphreys/PA)
In addition, Amanda Staveley, who played a key role in Sheikh Mansour’s takeover of Manchester City in 2008, caused great excitement on Tyneside last month when she was spotted among the crowd for the Magpies’ 1-1 Premier League draw at home to Liverpool.
Staveley, who is said to control around £28billion of Middle East money through PCP Capital Partners, is reportedly looking to invest in an English top-flight club and met club officials after the game. However, as yet there has been no expression of interest in Newcastle from that source.
There were claims during the summer that Newcastle were attracting interest from China, although nothing further has materialised, while it is understood America could yet prove a source of investment.
Just heard ….. pic.twitter.com/0RrorVrO07
— Alan Shearer (@alanshearer) October 16, 2017
Lawyer Andrew Henderson, who has acted on behalf of Ashley’s businesses in the recent past, is the man charged with handling the sale, and it is understood Monday’s announcement has prompted a flurry of activity.
Henderson, a partner at Dentons, hopes to broker a deal by the end of the year with insiders insisting Ashley’s firm intention is to sell this time after aborting two earlier attempts.
Newcastle are ninth in the Premier League after Sunday’s 2-2 draw at Southampton, which cemented a positive start to life back in the division after promotion.
The best news for @NUFC ever, it would be hard to find a worse owner than Mike Ashley for a team. pic.twitter.com/KMhvnptWOv
— Faustino Asprilla (@TinoasprillaH) October 16, 2017
The riches available to English football’s big guns – the current broadcast deal is worth £5.14billion – are a huge pull, and the Magpies enjoy the added advantages of having world-renowned manager Rafael Benitez at the helm and 52,000-plus home crowds.
However, an ongoing HMRC investigation into allegations that the club abused the tax system may prove a complication.
Benitez cut a frustrated figure in both January and the summer as his transfer plans were severely limited by Ashley’s decision not to fund major transfer spending, something the Spaniard believed would be forthcoming.
Ashley paid £134.4million for the club back in 2007 and has since made interest free loans totalling £129million, and his reluctance to commit further funds fuelled the rumours that he was ready to sell.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here