FRASER Brown is free to play for Scotland against Italy on Saturday after a Six Nations disciplinary committee decided the hooker should receive no further punishment for his yellow-card offence against England four days ago. Brown could have been suspended if the panel had agreed with the citing commissioner that the late tackle for which he was sin-binned was a red-card offence.
The Glasgow Warriors player accepted at the hearing in London that he had been guilty of foul play but argued that the tackle on England winger Elliot Daly was not a sending-off offence, and the three-man committee concurred. “The disciplinary committee, chaired by Jean-Philippe Lachaume (France),alongside Rhian Williams (Wales) and David Martin (Ireland), having reviewed footage of the incident and all other evidence, as well as hearing submissions and testimony from the player and his representatives, considered the tackle to have been dangerous, and therefore contrary to Law 10.4(e),” the Six Nations Championship authorities announced yesterday afternoon.
“The disciplinary committee, however, found that the act of foul play would have not have warranted a red card, and so the citing complaint was not upheld and no sanction was imposed. (The Disciplinary Committee also considered whether or not the player, in carrying out the tackle, had infringed Law 10.4(j), but found that not all of the necessary elements for foul play under that law had been present).
“The player is therefore able to resume playing immediately. All parties were reminded of their right to appeal.”
Law 10.4(e) says simply that “a player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously”. Law 10.4(j) defines dangerous tackling: “Lifting a player from the ground and dropping or driving that player into the ground whilst that player's feet are still off the ground such that the player’s head and/or upper body come into contact with the ground is dangerous play.”
If selected against Italy, Brown will be winning his 25th cap. He has started all four of Scotland’s matches so far in this year’s Championship.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here