THERE are few holes in the game of Andy Murray these days but the Scot will head to the Californian desert this week aiming to plug one of the few in his resume, a victory in Indian Wells.
Murray has never won the BNP Paribas Open in the Coachella desert – one of just three Masters 1000 titles he has yet to claim – but then he has never arrived there as the world No 1 and with such confidence.
His 6-3, 6-2 victory over the Spaniard, Fernando Verdasco, yesterday gave him a first Dubai Duty Free Tennis Championship title, a first title of 2017 and the 45th of his career.
“I struggled in Indian Wells and Miami last year, didn’t play so well,” said Murray, who admitted it will take a few days to recover from the 16-hour flight from Dubai to Los Angeles.
“This week’s obviously given me great momentum going into that stretch and hopefully I can play well there.”
When he does play his first match in Indian Wells, probably next weekend, he will do so in the knowledge that by the time the Tour hits the clay next month, he is likely to be streets ahead at the top of the world rankings.
This time last year, Murray was almost 8000 points behind Novak Djokovic at the top of the rankings, an absolute mile in tennis terms. But the beauty of the ranking system is that if the top two swap roles – as they did in 2016 when Djokovic slipped from his stunning level and Murray hit career-best form – then things can change quickly.
Murray leads Djokovic by 2215 points going into Indian Wells but Djokovic will be defending 1000 points there and in Miami, which follows immediately after.
By contrast, the Scot was beaten in the second round in Indian Wells and Miami last year, and has a mere 90 points to defend, offering him the chance to open up a big lead before he heads to the clay and a period of the season where he performed so well in 2016.
His victory over Verdasco was not quite as straightforward as the scoreline might suggest but as so often with the best players, Murray was able to get the job done without needing to hit top gear.
A poor opening service game saw him fall behind and a couple of poor forehands saw him trail 3-1 in the first set against an opponent who had only beaten him once in 13 previous meetings.
At 33, Verdasco had enjoyed a fine week but once Murray had broken back for 4-3, there was little doubt he would be holding up the trophy.
Verdasco’s resistance ended, effectively, when he was broken in the third game of the second set, his serve – which he was just rolling in with little pace – causing Murray fewer and fewer problems as the match progressed.
Complacency was Murray’s biggest concern as the second set drew to a close but the world No 1 remained rock solid, breaking again and closing it out with ease.
Having survived seven match points to beat Philipp Kohlschreiber in the quarter-finals, Murray may just have felt he was destined to win the title.
“Often when you get through matches like that it settles you down for the rest of the tournament and I played a good match today,” Murray said.
“Maybe the last couple of matches didn’t start the way I would have liked but once I got going, today I was moving well and finished strong.”
Murray has made the final in Indian Wells just once before, in 2009, but his form is there and his mind seems to be right.
“Obviously it’s always nice to win any tournament, but especially ones you haven’t won before,” Murray said. “I am very happy to do it here for the first time and it’s been a good start to the year.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here