HAS any nation made a more impressive start to 2017 than Spain? Their 8-1 win over fellow Euro qualifiers Switzerland in January was startling, even if it came in a friendly.
It was followed up on Wednesday with a 2-1 win over World Cup finalists Japan in the Algarve Cup. Then they beat Norway, who are ranked No 11 in the world, 3-0 on Friday.
Spain are second seeds behind England in Scotland's Euro group and these results suggest the task facing Anna Signeul and her players in the Netherlands has just got a great deal harder.
“Spain are getting better and better,” the Scotland coach said. “Their youth players are coming through and they are a very up-and-coming nation in women's football. The money they are starting to invest in their own league and players will make a difference.”
Back in 2012 Scotland were incredibly unlucky to lose 4-3 on aggregate to Spain in the play-off for the last place in Euro 2013. Yet for all the importance of the occasion, it was obvious from the choice of venue for the second leg - a glorified training pitch at the Spanish Federation's headquarters outside Madrid - that women's football wasn't taken all that seriously.
As soon as that changed – which it appears to have done now – there was only ever going to be one direction of travel. Rapidly upwards.
SCOTLAND lost their first game of the year on Friday when they went down 2-0 to a well-drilled South Korea side in the Cyprus Cup. The defeat makes an appearance in Wednesday's final unlikely as they slipped to third in Group B, a point behind the South Koreans and Austria.
That said, winning the tournament is of secondary importance to finding ways of making gains ahead of the Euros. It was more disappointing, then, that Rachel Corsie was ruled out of the tournament with a calf problem before a ball had been kicked.
Losing the Seattle Reign central defender has almost certainly put paid to the intended - and potentially rewarding - experiment of playing with a back three at some point in Cyprus.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here