IT’S been another stinker of a week for British Cycling. For an organisation which, in the aftermath of London 2012, was viewed as being unable to do any wrong, their fall from grace has been remarkable.
From accusations of sexism by coaching staff towards riders to the "package" that was delivered by a British Cycling employee to Team Sky for Bradley Wiggins – of which the contents remain unidentified – to the latest accusations from UK Sport chief executive Liz Nicholl that British Cycling showed “a complete lack of transparency” with regards to reporting the findings of an internal review conducted in 2012, cycling’s governing body has taken something of a beating in recent months.
Amidst the claims by UK Sport that British Cycling “watered-down” its findings and the sport’s rebuttal that they or any of their staff have behaved inappropriately, one comment in particular stood out to me. In defending his former employers, Sir Dave Brailsford, the former British Cycling performance director and current general manager of Team Sky, said: “We were not sexist but we were definitely ‘medallist’.”
It is interesting phrasing. Brailsford seems to be implying that British Cycling can indeed be a harsh environment but not due to sexism, rather, it is due to their insatiable appetite for medals. Looking in from the outside, it is hard to argue that their approach has been working: 14 Olympic medals in 2008, 12 in 2012 and another 12 in 2016 suggests that their system of producing medal-winning athletes is close to flawless.
And this is where some of the blame must be placed at UK Sport’s door. As long as UK Sport values medals above all else, they are leaving athletes open to being mistreated. UK Sport’s recent funding announcements highlight the all-consuming importance they place on medals and there has been more than one suggestion that as British Cycling’s medal yield was so great, UK Sport was willing to allow the organisation to operate with little outside scrutiny. British Cycling was praised to the hilt for its “no compromise” approach and it appears that none of the warning signs were picked up on by UK Sport. Any athlete who complained was accused of being bitter because the athletes who were winning gold medals weren’t complaining, were they?
Elite sport is a brutal environment – few would dispute that – but it is hard to justify treating athletes with such disregard amidst the justification of winning medals. While UK Sport should be praised for trying to improve conditions for athletes, they must also realise that while they care only about medals, the risk of their elite athletes being treated like dirt remains worryingly high.
AND ANOTHER THING . . .
The struggles that women’s sport faces as it attempts to bridge the gap to men’s sport in terms of profile, media coverage, sponsorship money and crowd sizes has been commented upon tirelessly. There is no doubt that gaining something approaching parity is, to say the least, challenging, but I was given considerable cause for hope this week. On Tuesday evening, I reported on the first match of Scotland’s new pro netball team, Sirens. After a year of planning and preparation, the team, which is Scotland’s first professional women’s team in any sport, made their debut in the Vitality Netball Superleague and despite being defeated by league favourites Wasps, there was considerable cause for encouragement.
A 4000-strong sell-out crowd packed into the Emirates Arena in Glasgow to cheer the home team on, the game was live on Sky Sports and there has been considerable interest in the squad, not least from Herald Sport. What Sirens have proven is that it is possible to force women’s sport into the public’s consciousness and, with a bit of imagination, it is possible to create considerable interest in a minority sport.
Claire Nelson, the chief executive of Netball Scotland, has been the driving force behind Sirens and there is no better example within Scottish sport of someone who has the passion, determination and brains to make things happen, even when there are considerable barriers in the way. Few would have predicted that a netball team could attract a bigger crowd than the vast majority of Scottish football teams but Nelson, who is a force of nature, has shown there is an appetite out there for women’s sport and this interest just needs to be exploited.
Too often, those in charge of minority sports spend more time moaning about their lack of profile than they spend doing something to improve it. Nelson could not be more different; she is a prime example of someone who shuts up and gets on with it and she is now reaping the benefits of her hard work. It remains to be seen if Sirens can maintain such impressive crowds as their season progresses. But regardless of how this year pans out for them, Nelson and the team around her have proven that if the commitment to really change things is there, it can be made to happen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here