The Scottish Football Association has reacted with surprise to PFA Scotland's call for more research, debate and better standards on artificial pitches.
Earlier this week, PFA Scotland chief executive Fraser Wishart outlined concerns players had over the long-term impact of playing on the surfaces, citing a 2013 survey that was never published.
The PFA's Stuart Lovell later revealed that 73 per cent of the 700 players surveyed stated they would rather play on deteriorating grass pitches than artificial surfaces and called for players' opinions to be given greater weight.
Quoting newspaper articles, an SFA statement read: "While most players, given the choice, said they would prefer to play on natural grass, it is inaccurate and misleading to say that 'the vast majority (of players) wanted to avoid Astroturf'. In actual fact, 42.5 per cent of respondents supported the use of synthetic surfaces in competitive matches.
"In addition, 52 per cent of respondents supported the use of synthetic surfaces for training on a regular basis."
The SFA stated that the 11 artificial pitches which are in use by 12 SPFL clubs need to meet FIFA's highest standards each year.
"The SPFL have also implemented an innovative 'spot-testing' protocol to ensure these standards are maintained throughout the season - the only league in the world to do so," the statement added.
The SFA also cited two pieces of research which found no significant difference in injuries between players using natural and artificial grass, although Wishart had called for research on the long-term impact.
The statement finished: "Given PFA Scotland are members of the Scottish FA congress we believe that to be a more productive forum to discuss matters of such importance in future."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here