Robbie Savage has hit back at John Terry in their row following the football pundit's criticism of the Chelsea skipper.
Terry said this week that he accepts criticism from top former players but that Savage was not qualified to pass comment because he had "played at a really bad level".
Savage claimed the "game is doomed" if criticism is only valid if it comes from former players who won major trophies and in that case 99 per cent of the football industry was unqualified.
"Evidently some people have been expecting me to return fire after being dug out by John Terry for daring to express opinions about football after playing 'at a really bad level' in my career," Savage wrote in his column in the Daily Mirror.
"Apparently I am not entitled to venture opinions about Terry on BT Sport, in the Daily Mirror or the BBC Six-0-Six phone-in because I have not won major trophies like fellow pundits Rio Ferdinand, Jamie Carragher or Gary Neville.
"I only played 346 games in the Premier League, captained four clubs in the top flight and won 39 international caps. So much for playing at a really bad level.
"John is entitled to his opinion. It's just a shame he thinks 99 per cent of the football industry - those of us who have not won the title or Champions League medals - is unqualified to express theirs.
"Journalists and pundits are employed to convey opinions based on what they see. Fans in pubs, schools, factories and offices argue about football on a daily basis.
"If criticism is only valid when it comes from old team-mates who played at the very highest level, the game is doomed."
Savage said that Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho never played the game at a high standard but when they expressed an opinion "the whole world listens" and that England boss Roy Hodgson never played in the Football League.
The former Wales midfielder added: "Perhaps, when I'm finished as a pundit, John will give me a job polishing all those trophies and medals he's won!"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel