As predicted here as soon as Wales were knocked out of the tournament, Nigel Owens will referee the World Cup final and there could be no better man for the job.
The little Welshman has been the outstanding referee in rugby union for many years now and has been exemplary at this tournament during which the difficulty of the job in a sport in which offences are committed by both sides at almost every collision zone, has once again been demonstrated.
Owens exudes authority and while some find his manner irksome and even patronising, it seems clear that he is greatly respected by the players.
He has, in recent years, come into his own in the era of the increasing involvement of television match officials (TMOs), handling the need to use them to double check on key moments in matches with common sense as he, too, watches the big screen, often makes up his own mind before the TMO has had a chance to offer his analysis and explains to them what he intends to do, sometimes not even giving them the chance to disagree.
He was at his best in this tournament when interrupting a TMO who seemed to be preparing to recommend the sin-binning, or perhaps worse, of Louis Picamoles during France’s thrashing by the All Blacks, when explaining that while contact had been made with a clench fist rubbing across a face it was neither a punch nor was there any suggestion that anything untoward had happened around the eyes, so a penalty and a warning would suffice.
There is no question who is in charge and, while there are no guarantees that he will not make important mistakes this weekend, but the vast majority will agree that a meeting between the two best teams in the world is set to be overseen by the best referee in the game.
It seems, too, increasingly likely that, other than the problems both have had at loosehead prop in the course of the last fortnight, the teams will be very close to full strength with Michael Cheika, Australia’s head coach, making further optimistic about the condition of full-back Israel Folau.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel