ALASTAIR COOK must solve the dilemma of Dubai if he is to lead his country to a piece of modern cricket history in their Test series against Pakistan.
No touring team has beaten Misbah-ul-Haq's men since Pakistan relocated their home Tests to the United Arab Emirates – and after England finished the opening match of three on the front foot, their hopes of becoming the first to do so are rising.
Cook began his tenure as England captain three years ago, on the first tour after their 3-0 whitewash against Pakistan here, with a memorable series win in India.
England went 1-0 down in late 2012, yet fought back to win 2-1 and become the first from their country to succeed in India since 1984/85.
Cook puts the ongoing challenge on a par but can be encouraged approaching the second Test of three, at the Dubai International Stadium today, by a better start this time.
In India three years ago, despite a trademark tour-de-force century from their new captain, England lost initially in Ahmedabad.
Last week in Abu Dhabi, another Cook special – almost 14 hours of it, for a monumental 263 – allowed a brief shot at victory before bad light ushered in a stalemate after all.
Asked to compare the difficulty of two of Test cricket's toughest assignments, Cook said: "It's the same challenge really – two good sides in their home conditions. No one has beaten Pakistan here yet, and it would be great to be the first side to do it."
The next hurdle is an especially tricky one, though, at a venue where team selection is more critical than ever.
Cook admits he is tempted to stick with the line-up which finished so strongly last week.
The potential of spin is obvious – and after Adil Rashid and Moeen Ali bowled Pakistan out for 173 in their second innings, the hosts have their own fit-again matchwinner Yasir Shah available again.
Yet Cook also knows from personal experience, in England's last Test in Dubai, that seam can be effective too – especially before the sun gets to work each day – as Stuart Broad and James Anderson proved by taking seven wickets between them to hustle Pakistan out for just 99 on that occasion.
Ben Stokes' well-being is another complicating element for England.
He came through nets with no obvious ill-effects yesterday, having missed training 24 hours earlier with a stomach bug.
Cook, coach Trevor Bayliss and fellow management staff therefore have much to ponder.
They could be seen doing so too for several minutes – and taking a long, quizzical look at the pitch – before England began their practice session.
Should they decide not to gamble on Stokes' fitness, the obvious contingency is a Test return for fellow all-rounder Samit Patel.
But as a third spinner, rather than fourth seamer, Patel represents a significant tactical shift.
Factoring all of the above, Cook's assessment of conditions will be crucial.
"It should be a better cricket wicket [than for the first Test]," he said.
"It will turn more and be a bit quicker – last time [in 2012] there was more for the seamers.
"It's a unique stadium – the shadow is still there at 10am, and that allows for dampness in the wicket and movement."
Three spinners is a contingency England will be prepared to risk if necessary, though.
"It would have to be an option with a dry wicket," Cook added.
"We said at the beginning of the tour this squad has that option – all the spinners bat well."
The presence of Stokes, who finished with a flattering first-innings four for 57 as Pakistan pushed for their declaration last week, is reassuring for Cook.
"Ben's bowling at six gives us balance – we bat down to eight definitely," he said.
"He's had a virus, a 24-hour bug. He didn't look very well yesterday apparently. He should be fine, but we've got to be careful.
"Ben is concern, but everyone has pulled up pretty well."
There was no pun intended, given Stokes' condition, when his captain added: "My gut instinct is we stay unchanged."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here